TORY and Labour MSPs have asked the Lord Advocate to investigate if short-term lets licensing breaches human rights laws in a last-ditch attempt ahead of the scheme deadline.
It will be a criminal offence to let either a room in a home or an entire property after October 1 without a license, with operators already given a six-month extension to the deadline.
With just over a week to go, SNP MSP Fergus Ewing joined Holyrood parliamentarians from the Scottish Tories, Scottish Labour and Scottish LibDems calling for an intervention from Scotland’s top law officer.
READ MORE: SNP MP bids to move independence trigger from most seats to most votes
It comes after the Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers (ASSC) claimed the regulations may be in breach of privacy and protection legislation in a letter to Humza Yousaf.
They alleged the requirement for hosts to publicly disclose their personal data on application notices and council licensing registers may be in contravention of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Scotland Act 1998, as well as General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act.
The ASSC’s CEO, Fiona Campbell, has previously claimed that the scheme is sexist.
Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain KC and Scottish Government Permanent Secretary John-Paul Marks have now been asked to intervene by five MSPs, all of whom signed a letter calling for the First Minister to pause the scheme last month.
The letter is signed by SNP rebel Ewing (above), Labour’s Daniel Johnston, LibDem Willie Rennie and Scottish Tory MSPs Miles Briggs and Murdo Fraser.
We previously told how a third of those MSPs who signed the letter to Humza Yousaf had relevant interests in the sector, including Ewing and Fraser, both of whom are landlords.
The letter states: “We ask that you pause the rollout and encourage the relevant changes to be made, to provide certainty that business owners require to sustain and grow and continue to make a substantial contribution to Scotland’s economy and long-term prosperity.”
It also said hosts must be provided with “full certainty that the scheme is lawful”.
The Scottish Government previously said it has conducted impact assessments on issues such as data protection.
READ MORE: FMQs: Shona Robison slams Douglas Ross over 'shouting her down'
The FM, Wellbeing Economy Secretary Neil Gray and Housing Minister Paul McLennan have all insisted that the Scottish Government will not back down and pause the scheme.
The ASSC said 53% of operators have said they plan to remain open following its rollout, but McLennan told The National’s Holyrood Weekly podcast that the figures should be taken with caution as the ASSC does not represent everyone operating in the industry.
In supporting the letter, Ewing said: “If this isn’t suspended now, the huge blunder of these regulations will need to be unpicked later on, which is an infinitely more painful task.”
Ewing is reportedly facing disciplinary action after voting against the Scottish Government before recess and joined the Tories, Labour and LibDems in voting against the scheme last week when a vote was brought before Holyrood, which ultimately failed.
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
The scheme covers bed and breakfasts, guest houses and self-catering sites, but will not apply to hotels.
It requires hosts to display energy performance ratings on listings, have adequate buildings and public liability insurance, as well as various fire and gas safety precautions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel