THE Conservatives have sparked outrage with plans to ban trans women from being treated in female hospital wards.
Speaking at the Tory conference in Manchester Health Secretary Steve Barclay said the change was to recognise “the importance of different biological needs” in health care, but LGBT+ charity Stonewall said it would discourage trans people from seeking healthcare.
A spokesperson said: "This is a cynical attempt by the Secretary of State to ‘look busy’ instead of getting on with the graft of implementing the women’s health strategy, and, besides being unworkable, all it will achieve is to restrict access to healthcare for trans women, by making it humiliating and dangerous.”
The NHS constitution will be changed following a consultation later this year, according to Barclay, to prevent trans women from being treated in female hospital wards.
The current rules
As it stands, the NHS constitution in England requires that trans people “should be accommodated according to their presentation”, meaning how they identify and how they dress.
READ MORE: Feminists hit back at trans-exclusionary activists in open letter
There are exceptions, including prohibiting “pre-operative” trans people from using open shower facilities.
It notes that privacy can “usually be ensured through the use of curtains or by accommodation in a single side room adjacent to a gender appropriate ward”.
Hitting out at 'diversity and inclusion'
Barclay said: “To deliver the change the NHS needs, we need a relentless focus on patient outcomes and that mean prioritising frontline resources.
"It does not mean spending huge sums of taxpayers’ money on diversity consultants or hiring bloated internal diversity and inclusion teams.
"I know as Conservatives, we know what a women is."
— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 3, 2023
The Health Secretary explains why he "ordered a reversal of unacceptable changes to the NHS website that erased references to women for conditions such as cervical cancer".https://t.co/UyZUj3KBg6
📺 Sky 501 / YouTube pic.twitter.com/kSXyN6DG6C
“And it does not mean ignoring patient voices, especially women’s voices, when it comes to the importance of biological sex in healthcare.
“If we do not get this right now the long-term consequences could be very serious for the protection of women and future generations. And conference, I know as Conservatives we know what a woman is and I know that us majority and the vast majority of NHS staff and patients do too.
“That is why I ordered a reversal of unacceptable changes to the NHS website that erase references to women for conditions such as cervical cancer and stopped the NHS ordering staff to declare pronouns to each new patient.
“And that is why today I am going further by announcing that we will change the NHS constitution following a consultation later this year to make sure we respect the privacy, dignity and safety of all patients, recognise the importance of different biological needs and protect the rights of women.”
He was backed by Home Secretary Suella Braverman who said that “trans women have no place in women’s wards or indeed any safe space relating to biological women”.
She added: “And the Health Secretary is absolutely right to clarify and make it clear that biological men should not have treatments in the same wards and in the same safe spaces as biological women.
“This is about protecting women’s dignity, and women’s safety and women’s privacy.
“And that’s why I’m incredibly supportive and I welcome the announcement today by the Health Secretary.”
But his comments sparked fury from opponents, with the Scottish Greens accusing the party of "stoking of hate against trans people" as part of their election strategy.
Maggie Chapman, the Greens MSP for the North East, said: "This isn't even a dog whistle. It is a deafening foghorn blown by a desperate Tory Government that I hope is in the last days of its terrible reign.
"These comments are yet another shameful attack on the dignity and safety of a small and already very marginalised group that is bearing the brunt of a cynical and reactionary culture war that has been waged by Downing Street.
"The Prime Minister and his colleagues have spent the last few years spreading the most vile misinformation without any concern for the consequences.
"They have opposed even very small and basic changes like Gender Recognition Reform in Scotland that would take some of the pain and bureaucracy out of a process that can be traumatic.
"Now they are now trying to remove rights that trans people have had for years in order to score political points. It is clear they mean to ramp up their stoking of hate against trans people as part of what I have no doubt will be a divisive and disgraceful election campaign.
"Trans rights are human rights, and my heart, rage and solidarity is with our LGBTQIA+ community and our trans siblings in particular who are being targeted, scapegoated and punished by this rotten, reactionary and bigoted Tory Government."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel