BROADCASTERS scrambled to issue warnings and offer apologies as their live coverage of the Covid-19 Inquiry featured a string of colourful language and expletives.
The appearance of Lee Cain, Boris Johnson’s long-term adviser who served as No 10’s communications director in the pandemic, and Dominic Cummings, who served as the then-prime minister’s chief adviser, at the inquiry initiated a barrage of swearing as their Whatsapp messages were read out.
Broadcasters airing the inquiry live were forced to issue warnings about the nature of the language.
The BBC news channel featured the on-screen caution: “Warning: coverage may contain expletives.”
READ MORE: Watch as lawyers forced to read out Dominic Cummings 'f***pig' texts
As Cummings was sworn in after Cain, viewers were told: “Just an apology to reiterate that there has been some very strong language, plenty of expletives, over the past couple of hours of coverage.
“This is as messages from those in between Number 10 were read out or have been read out, and that may well continue so apologies in advance, those are unedited and we don’t get any warning of those.”
Sky News also featured an on-screen warning reading “Warning: Offensive language”.
At the start of his evidence, lead counsel to the inquiry Hugo Keith KC told Cummings: “Due in large part to your own Whatsapps, Cummings, we are going to have to coarsen our language somewhat.”
Cummings replied: “I apologise.”
READ MORE: Scottish fireworks event cancelled after threats to staff
Keith proceeded to tell Cummings: “You called ministers useless f***pigs, morons, c***s, in email and Whatapps to your professional colleagues.”
Cummings said he was “reflecting a widespread view amongst competent people at the centre of power at the time about the calibre of a lot of senior people who were dealing with this crisis extremely badly.”
BBC viewers were told: “Just a reminder we are watching live unedited coverage of the Covid inquiry …There is more repeated expletives that we are hearing.
“We are repeating our apology on behalf of what you can hear but it is not within our control, unfortunately, what is read out there.
“Just a repeat of our apology that you are hearing some expletives and strong language.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel