CALLS for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas will be refreshed when parliament is recalled next week, as pressure grows on Keir Starmer to take a stronger stance on the conflict.
The Labour leader is facing intense media scrutiny over the disunity in his party on the conflict in Gaza, with around a third of his MPs at odds with the leadership’s opposition to calling for ceasefire.
He was told to resign by two Labour council leaders on Friday and has been publicly contradicted by big names such as Anas Sarwar, Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham.
Now Labour backbencher Richard Burgon has confirmed he will be resubmitting an early day motion to press the issue when parliament resumes after the King’s Speech on Tuesday.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer can't say if he would condemn Israel for using chemical weapons
He said: “Over 10,000 people in Gaza and Israel have already lost their lives in the last month alone.
“Preventing the deaths of any more civilians must be our top priority.
“Our government must now use every diplomatic avenue possible and talk to governments of all persuasions to secure a negotiated ceasefire – one binding on all parties – that can bring an end to this crisis.”
Early day motions are effectively erased when parliament is prorogued, as happened last week, meaning the motion will need to be resubmitted.
Prior to the prorogation, it received the backing of 94 MPs including Burgon.
It was backed by many SNP MPs, both of Alba’s MPs, and a raft of Labour left-wingers.
Some shadow ministers signed the motion, including Imran Hussain. Liam Byrne, formerly chief secretary to the Treasury under Gordon Brown and someone seen as being on Labour’s right-wing, also signed the motion.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel