STEPHEN Flynn has branded calls for a “sustainable ceasefire” from the Conservatives and Labour a “word scramble” as he urged UK leaders to back the demand for an immediate ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war.
The UK Government’s subtle shift in its position on the conflict was indicated on Sunday when Foreign Secretary David Cameron said he wanted to see “a ceasefire, but only if it is sustainable”, in a piece for the Sunday Times.
His calls were backed by Labour leader Keir Starmer who said: “We need to get to a sustainable ceasefire as quickly as possible.”
Rishi Sunak (below) has also used the phrase, referring to it during PMQs last week – noting that “means Hamas must stop launching rockets into Israel and release all the hostages”.
The UK Government had previously been pressing for “humanitarian pauses” in the conflict as a means of getting aid into Gaza.
Flynn criticised UK politicians for spending time deciding on “what language is best to use”.
He said: “This latest word scramble from the Tories, followed closely by the Labour leadership, will fool nobody - we need an ‘immediate ceasefire’ because only that course of action will save civilian lives.
READ MORE: Several killed and wounded after Israeli air strike hits Gaza’s largest hospital
“Everyday that the UK pontificates on what language is best to use to avoid calling for an ‘immediate ceasefire’ is another day where the Palestinian people are collectively punished for the actions of a terrorist group.
“How many more people have to die before the two main UK political parties get in line with global opinion and back an immediate ceasefire?”
It comes amid a ferocious bombardment of Gaza with reports Israel bombed the strip’s biggest hospital.
Al Jazeera television aired footage appearing to show the aftermath of the strike on Shifa Hospital, in Gaza City, with several people sprawled lifeless on the ground inside the medical compound, which includes several buildings.
What is a ‘sustainable ceasefire’?
The wording is carefully chosen to distinguish from an "immediate ceasefire".
In the UK Government’s formulation, it appears to rely on Hamas ending its attacks on Israel and releasing the more than 200 hostages still held captive.
Proponents of this approach say it will mean a lasting peace in the region. But critics say that negotiations on issues like the release of hostages held by Hamas or Palestinians imprisoned in Israel must take place against the backdrop of a ceasefire – pointing to the huge loss of life in Palestine and unbearable conditions in under-siege Gaza.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel