SCOTS could enjoy the higher living standards of countries such as Denmark, Finland and Ireland under independence with the average household more than £10,000 better off, the First Minister is expected to say.
Humza Yousaf will highlight the “prize of independence” when he speaks at Glasgow University tomorrow in what is being billed as the first of a series of major economic speeches.
He is expected to say that the Brexit-based UK economy has failed people in Scotland and that UK-based political parties are offering no alternatives to a “failed Westminster economic model", while outlining how independence would raise productivity and living standards.
He will say that although it will not happen overnight, independence will mean Scotland can begin to start catching up on more prosperous countries such as Denmark, Ireland and Finland.
READ MORE: SNP: Scotland is potentially missing out on billions from EU
The First Minister will also draw comparisons between the SNP, Labour and the Tories – including on the EU and migration – ahead of the General Election expected this year, as well as releasing plans for industrial policy in an independent Scotland.
His speech comes after a similar event held by Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer last week, while Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told journalists he favoured the second half of the year for a new poll.
In the first speech, the First Minister is expected to draw heavily from a report published last month by think tank the Resolution Foundation.
The "Ending stagnation – The Economy 2030 Inquiry" report found that if the UK closed its income and inequality gaps to the same level as similar economies – namely Australia, Canada, France, Germany and the Netherlands – households would be £8300 better off.
The First Minister will say: “If we use the same analysis for countries that are similar to Scotland – such as Denmark, Ireland and Finland – the difference for the typical Scottish household would be even greater.
“They would be £10,200 better off. That is the prize of independence.
“Not to match the performance of those independent countries overnight, no-one is saying that, but to start catching up so Scotland’s level of prosperity becomes more normal, more like that of comparable nations. It is the UK that is the outlier.”
While Scotland has “extraordinary resources” and “key economic strengths”, Yousaf will say the UK economy is one of “low growth, low productivity and chronic inequality”.
He will also launch an attack on the two main Westminster parties, kicking off a year likely to be dominated by electioneering.
“Both Labour and the Conservatives agree that the UK should be out of the EU and the huge European single market, and they both want to cut vital inward migration,” he is expected to say.
“Those are just two examples which demonstrate that for the two main UK parties, Westminster political interests will always override Scottish economic interests.
“Keir Starmer’s inability to offer any alternative to the managed decline of the UK is an abdication of leadership.
“The SNP Scottish Government will ensure that Scotland, its economy and its people are not ignored by Westminster.”
READ MORE: New Scottish independence paper outlines benefits of rejoining EU
The speeches, which are expected to cover areas including workers’ rights, inward investment, the business landscape and ownership, will supplement the independence papers in the Building a New Scotland series.
Started under Nicola Sturgeon, the papers are designed to form the prospectus for an independent Scotland.
Opposition politicians attacked Yousaf over the economy, with Scottish Labour economy spokesman Daniel Johnson said the country’s potential had been “held back by an SNP Government bereft of ideas or ambition”.
“Families don’t need fantasy economics from Humza Yousaf in the middle of a cost of living crisis, they need his government to get a grip on its waste and incompetence,” he added.
Scottish Tory finance spokeswoman Liz Smith said it “beggars belief” that the First Minister will “lecture people on economics” after she claimed his Government “created a £1.5 billion black hole in Scotland’s finances”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel