FLYING six people to the edge of space is cheaper than the UK sending one failed asylum seeker to Rwanda, MPs have heard.
The UK Government was mocked over the cost of the stalled deportation scheme as MPs considered amendments made by peers to the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
MPs are expected to reject changes made by the Lords to the Government’s Rwanda legislation, setting up a battle with peers which could delay the bill’s passage until after Easter.
Downing Street said the UK Government believed it had “the right bill” and “it remains our plan to get it through as quickly as possible”.
Officials “are identifying and have identified the cohort of people who will be the first to board flights” to Rwanda, No 10 said.
READ MORE: Chaos as minister urges Tory plotters to stop move to oust Rishi Sunak
Labour MP Neil Coyle (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) told the Commons: “Is the minister aware that Virgin Galactic can send six people into space for less than this Government wants to spend sending one person to Rwanda?
“Is it not time to rethink this absurd policy and extortionate cost?”
Home Office minister Michael Tomlinson questioned why so few Labour MPs attended a debate last week to discuss the cost of the scheme, adding: “That shows the priority – or the lack of priority – which those opposite give to that.”
The scheme could cost taxpayers nearly £2 million for each of the first 300 asylum seekers sent to Rwanda, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).
Tickets for Virgin Galactic flights initially went on sale for around £158,000 each and last summer cost around £356,000 per person – putting the cost of six space tourists at £2.13m.
Shadow Home Office minister Stephen Kinnock also remarked on the costs after Coyle’s comparison, telling MPs: “That really does show that the Rwanda plan is a galactically wasteful policy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel