Good evening and welcome to the Worst of Westminster! Don't forget you can receive this newsletter straight into your inbox for free every week by clicking the banner above.
Thatcherites in disguise
“If Margaret Thatcher wins on Thursday, I warn you not to be ordinary, I warn you not to be young, I warn you not to fall ill, I warn you not to grow old.”
The chilling words of former Labour leader Neil Kinnock in 1983, warning the public of the chaos that would ensue if Thatcher was voted back in as prime minister that year after unemployment rocketed to three million on her watch.
But fast forward 40 years and it’s becoming a bit of a struggle to find a Labour frontbencher who isn’t publicly praising the Milk Snatcher.
It started with leader Keir Starmer just before Christmas who said she had effected “meaningful change” in Britain and “set loose our natural entrepreneurialism” in an article directly appealing to Conservative voters to switch to Labour.
It appears now that he had started a bit of a game of pass the parcel, with more layers of Labour praise for Thatcher emerging at pace this week.
The week started with shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves saying a Labour government would be as radical as Thatcher and that she deserved praise for delivering “supply-side reforms” and rejecting Britain’s “managed decline”. That was before shadow foreign secretary David Lammy described her as a “visionary leader”.
Labour MP Darren Jones also claimed Thatcher oversaw a “decade of national renewal for our country”.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn: Scottish Government's Gaza stance 'very helpful'
The rhetoric is nothing short of astonishing. This was the woman who decimated mining heartlands across Scotland and the UK with many areas still suffering as a result of her disregard for the idea of community.
The mere mention of her name sends chills through the spine for so many. I remember one such incident at the dinner table when I was a teenager, when I was talking about studying her politics for my A levels. One of my relatives who was a student when she was in power almost instantly left the room because of the nerve it struck.
If you had any doubts that Labour were becoming indiscernible from the Tories, I’m sure many of you will now be convinced. They’re begging the right to accept them and if that means heaping praise upon the woman who has been described as a contemporary villain at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, then so be it.
For those of you who are familiar with the musical Hamilton the line “if you stand for nothing Burr what’ll you fall for?” – in reference to former US vice president Aaron Burr – springs to mind.
Inside the lobby with Westminster reporter Hamish Morrison
After Prime Minister’s Questions on a Wednesday, reporters file out of the press gallery and into a small room behind and above the Speaker’s chair to put questions to the Prime Minister’s spokespeople in what is known as a “lobby briefing”.
It typically begins with the official spokesman listing “diary” events – things the Government is doing in Parliament or out there in the real world.
To me, this rather dull portion has the ring of the brief news bulletin they give on Radio 4’s Today programme. It’s blunt and quite boring.
“Any questions on diary,” the spokesman asks, looking around a press pack of around 30 journalists.
Someone hopefully asks when the Rwanda Bill can be expected to wrap up in the Lords that evening.
“I couldn’t say when it would be done,” he replies, unhelpfully.
A few more attempts at planning the day ahead founder before he asks if we shall move onto topics.
In an unusually quiet week, the room falls silent. “Don’t all rush at once,” says the spokesman.
A few awkward laughs. The atmosphere at these sessions frequently triggers awkward laughter, the kind often elicited by job interviews.
Why the tension? There stands before hungry journalists a man with more insight into the real goings on behind the door of No 10 than any of them could hope to achieve.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour overruled by UK party on WASPI women support
His job is to be truthful – and if you don’t believe that, look what happened to Boris Johnson once it became apparent his spokesman was giving incorrect information to journalists at lobby.
But not too truthful. He could, if he became possessed by madness, stand there and spill out how the Prime Minister was really feeling.
“Yes, you’d be correct to characterise the PM as ‘bricking it’ for the local elections.”
“Yes, the PM is glad to see the back of Lee Anderson. Always thought he was a bit of a bore and promoting him to vice chairman of the party was a gamble that didn’t pay off.”
His job is to spin. This week the topic of inflation came up. Rishi Sunak has been keen to harp on about how his “plan is working” because the rate at which prices are going up has slowed.
Yes, the bar is low. But readers with any sort of working memory may recall the PM doing his utmost to say that soaring prices were nothing to do with him – a big war in Ukraine done it and ran away.
The Prime Minister’s party spokeswoman – who takes on questions of a more tribal political flavour – attempts to claim the Conservatives are responsible for falling inflation but not when it went up.
“I’ve been in these lobbies where, when inflation wasn’t falling so sharply, you definitely connected it to the Government record,” she swipes.
The spokesman intervenes to quote some brainy types at the OBR who said the Budget had helped to bring down inflation.
At some point, Andrew Marr asks whether the PM has any words for Leo Varadkar who has that day “decided after lots of plotting in his party he is not the right person to take it into the General Election”.
This punctures the tension and gets a few titters. Sunak’s spokesman says “we wish him well”.
He’ll likely be giving the same message to the boss in a few months.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel