FIONA Bruce repeatedly challenged Keir Starmer over his previous statement that Jeremy Corbyn would make a great prime minister.
It came after the Labour leader ducked a volley of questions from audience members at the BBC Question Time election special over whether he truly believed his predecessor would make a “great” prime minister.
The debate also featured Rishi Sunak, LibDem leader Ed Davey, and the SNP’s John Swinney.
READ MORE: BBC Question Time: Rishi Sunak faces shouts of 'shame' from audience
“It wasn’t a question that really arose because I didn’t think we were going to win the election,” Starmer said to Bruce’s questioning over the statement.
When Bruce then asked for a yes or no answer to whether he meant it, there was laughter (below) from the audience when he did not give one, instead saying that Corbyn would be a better premier than Boris Johnson.
Painful as Question Time audience laughs at Keir Starmer due to his repeated refusal to answer Fiona Bruce's question on Jeremy Corbyn 👇 pic.twitter.com/QfKLeydK3i
— The National (@ScotNational) June 21, 2024
The Labour leader has in recent weeks sought to distance himself from Corbyn, while his party is forecast by opinion polls to sweep to victory in the election.
He criticised the Conservatives’ election offer as a “Jeremy Corbyn-style manifesto” that would “load everything into the wheelbarrow” without explaining how to pay for it.
An audience member asked the Labour leader about his remarks.
“You criticised the Tory manifesto as Jeremy Corbyn-like,” they said, adding: “Anything you want can go in it, nothing is costed. Why did you back his original manifesto in 2019?”
Starmer replied: “In 2019 I campaigned for the Labour Party as I’ve always campaigned for the Labour Party.”
He said that afterwards it became clear the electorate “thought it was too much and they wanted to see something which was fully costed and fully funded”.
Corbyn has accused his successor of attempting to rewrite history with his recent comments.
The now independent candidate for Islington North said Starfmer had displayed “double standards” in expressing this opinion now, but not while serving in Corbyn’s shadow cabinet.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel