QUESTION Time host Fiona Bruce has been slammed for trying to “pull Stephen Flynn” into the Westminster betting scandal during Thursday night’s programme.
A number of figures have come under scrutiny in the ongoing scandal, with Cabinet minister Alister Jack recently “joking” about placing three bets on the timing of the election.
The Tories have already dropped two candidates who are under investigation for allegedly placing suspicious bets about the date of the election.
Craig Williams and Laura Saunders were both set to stand for the party in the General Election.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond: SNP politicians won't make sacrifices for independence
At least three more party figures and seven police officers are being investigated, alongside one Labour candidate.
While the issue was being discussed on Question Time on Thursday night, Flynn said he had been left “scunnered” by the news.
“It’s not good enough and you deserve better, and you should demand so much better from your politicians which is why at this election you should vote for people who have strong values and you should vote for what you believe in,” Flynn said.
Bruce then interrupted to ask if this included the people of Scotland “given what’s going on with the SNP at the moment” in terms of the investigation into party finances.
Flynn hit back and said: “I’m not sure there’s an equivalence between the gambling…”
Bruce interrupted once again to say she was not saying it was “equivalent” but that it was about “issues of trust”.
At the end of May, police confirmed they had submitted a report to the Crown Office after Peter Murrell, the former chief executive of the SNP, was charged in connection with embezzlement.
The SNP’s Westminster leader (below) said he could not comment on an active police investigation while Bruce said she was trying to make the show relevant to Scotland and Flynn given it was being broadcast from Birmingham and that it was about “issues of trust”.
Flynn continued: “This was the point I was coming on to make, so for this election for people in Scotland but hopefully for people here as well, you should base your decision on what your politician’s views are for the future.
“Now, our vision is very clear. We believe you should have investment in the NHS, we believe you should reject £18 billion of austerity cuts, we believe you should rejoin the European single market, increase migration because it’s good for the economy and ultimately double down on investment in net zero technologies because that’s what the rest of the world is doing.”
A number of figures within the SNP took to Twitter/X to discuss Bruce’s remarks with MSP James Dornan saying: “Jeez I’ve just walked in the door, turned on TV to hear Fiona Bruce pull Stephen Flynn into the betting scandal because… eh I’m still not sure.
“What a pathetic attempt to deflect from the corrupt Tories. She truly is awful.”
Dornan added that although he was aware Bruce had said the SNP weren’t involved in the betting scandal, “her demeanour when she talks to any of us is very revealing”.
Elsewhere, Pete Wishart the SNP’s candidate for Perth and Kinross-shire, commented: “Maybe Fiona Bruce should just answer for Stephen Flynn because she’s not giving him any chance to make any sort of point.
“Quite extraordinary interrupting.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel