RACHEL Reeves has been slammed for “staggering hypocrisy” after an old tweet resurfaced in which she railed against cutting government spending.
It comes after the Labour Chancellor announced last month that she was scrapping winter fuel payments for most pensioners, as well as plans for social care reform and road, rail and hospital investment.
But in the unearthed tweet from 2020, Reeves takes aim at Tory austerity.
READ MORE: Unearthed Rachel Reeves clips undermines her own Winter Fuel Payment claim
In the accompanying clip (below), Reeves said to MPs in the House of Commons: “The truth is that if you stunt growth by cutting government spending, by discouraging businesses from investing and allowing productivity to stagnate, you choke off the growth that we need to raise living standards.
Staggering hypocrisy as she now implements precisely the strategy she criticised so eagerly in opposition. An utter disgrace. https://t.co/MQuRQmbtTf
— Dave Doogan MP (@DaveDooganSNP) August 29, 2024
SNP MP Dave Doogan highlighted the tweet, and called out Reeves for currently implementing “precisely the strategy she criticised so eagerly in opposition”.
He added: “An utter disgrace.”
It comes after a separate clip (below) was also unearthed on Wednesday showing Reeves – ten years ago and firmly on the opposition benches – arguing for the Winter Fuel Payment to be cut back.
Rachel Reeves has repeatedly said she didn't want to cut the universal winter fuel allowance for pensioners but it was a tough decision forced on her because of the financial black hole left by the last govt
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) August 28, 2024
Here's Reeves 10 years ago: pic.twitter.com/1BAIL4racv
In a video shared on social media by Saul Staniforth, Reeves said: “We are the party who have said that we would cut the winter fuel allowance for the richest pensioners.
“We're the party that said we would means-test that benefit to save money, something which on the other side of the house you haven't supported.
“So the reality is we're the party who are willing to take tough decisions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel