THE UK Government’s brutal welfare cuts have for the first time officially been blamed for the death of a disabled dad.
The 60-year-old man with serious mental health problems killed himself after being hounded back to work by Iain Duncan Smith’s Department of Work and Pensions(DWP) after being on disability benefits for 10 years.
An investigation found that the “trigger” for the suicide was “his recent assessment by a DWP doctor as being fit for work”.
The London-based coroner has written to the DWP raising concerns that “there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.
Last month, we revealed that thousands of people have died after being declared “fit for work” sparking fresh calls from campaigners and politicians for an overhaul of the Tory Government’s welfare regime.
New statistics released by the DWP show that more than 80 people a month are dying shortly after the work capability assessment (WCA) found them fit for work.
The shocking figures revealed that 2,380 claimants died between December 2011 and February 2014 shortly after being told to get back to work and their benefits were being stopped.
However, this is the first time an official has ruled that the death of a claimant was as a direct result of being found fit for work.
The coroner’s report has sparked fury among Scottish disability rights campaigners and Social Justice Secretary Alex Neil who say this is “the most damning evidence yet” which proves that the benefit reforms are killing people.
Disabled activists described the ruling as “ground-breaking” in the fight to get the fitness-for-work tests scrapped and replaced with a more humane and less dangerous assessment.
Neil said: “This coroner’s verdict is the most damning evidence yet of the appalling cost of the UK Tory government’s inhumane welfare policies.
“This man’s suicide has been linked directly by the coroner to the fact he was assessed by the DWP as being ‘fit for work’ – despite a huge weight of expert medical evidence to the contrary. The fact that none of this medical evidence was taken into account by the DWP is totally unacceptable.
“This utterly tragic case is the starkest example imaginable of the reality of what is happening as a result of Tory welfare cuts – and it only begs the question as to how many more cases like this may go uncovered.”
Following the inquest, the coroner wrote to the DWP saying that the Atos healthcare professional had failed to take into account the views of any of the man’s doctors during a 90-minute assessment, telling him the DWP decision-maker would look at that evidence instead.
But the Atos assessor did not request any reports or letters from his GP, who had assessed him as not being well enough to work, his psychiatrist who diagnosed him with recurrent depression and panic disorder with agoraphobia, or his clinical psychologist, who had assessed him as “very anxious and showing signs of clinical depression”.
Instead, the man, from north London, was found fit for work and six months later, he killed himself in the autumn of 2013. The inquest took place last year but the shocking details of the report have only just emerged.
The coroner’s verdict stated: “The anxiety and depression were long-term problems, but the intense anxiety that triggered his suicide was caused by his recent assessment by the DWP as being fit for work, and his view of the likely consequences of that.”
A spokesperson for Disabled People Against Cuts said: “This is a ground-breaking verdict, which must now put the onus on the DWP to explain themselves since the response they provided to the coroner was pitiful, callous and inadequate.”
The patient-led Black Triangle disability rights campaign co-founder, John McArdle, said the case provided “the first irrefutable evidence from a member of the judiciary that the DWP’s regime has been directly responsible for the death of a disabled person and that there exists no reliable mechanism for doctors to flag up substantial risk”.
He added: “It is now incumbent on the government to respond swiftly and meaningfully.”
A DWP spokesman said: “Suicide is a tragic and complex issue and we take these matters extremely seriously.
“Following reforms to the work capability assessment, which was introduced in 2008, people are getting more tailored support to return to work instead of being written off on long term sickness benefits as happened too often in the past.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here