DOZENS of migrants have been on hunger strike for over a week at a controversial detention centre in Scotland.
The detainees, most of whom are asylum seekers, at Dungavel Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) have been protesting conditions and demanding a time-limit on how long people can be detained.
Up to 70 people initially took part in the action but numbers involved are since believed to have dropped to around 25.
The strike at Dungavel is the latest in a wave of actions in detention centres across Britain as the UK Government’s detention policy comes under heightened scrutiny.
The Scottish Government spokesman said: “It is deeply concerning that anyone should be on hunger strike at Dungavel.
“While asylum and immigration are reserved issues, we strongly urge the UK Government to ensure these matters are dealt with as humanely as possible.”
The hunger strike is reported to have started at Harmondsworth IRC near Heathrow Airport on Sunday March 8 and quickly spread to various centres across the UK, including Dungavel.
Detainees have been documenting their experiences on the “Detained Voices” blog online and have spoken of threats and intimidation from guards at the centres.
One detainee taking part in the strike said: “I’m not eating and the officers are telling me they are going to move me from Dungavel. They say that to everyone who is doing protest. They are trying to scare us.”
SNP MSP Sandra White said: “That people are resorting to these desperate measures is a damning indictment of some of the absolutely shameful practices employed at Dungavel – and shows exactly why we need a new direction when it comes to asylum and immigration policy.
“This episode is a depressing reminder that Westminster has too often shown scant regard for the rights of people detained at Dungavel – so it should come as no surprise that some of these people feel they have no other option but to resort to measures like this.
“The UK is the only country in the EU which has no cap on how long people can be detained under immigration powers.
“It is time for a new approach which prioritises compassion and fairness over punishment and isolation – helping those who seek asylum to more easily integrate into our communities and allowing our national life to benefit from their skills and their culture.”
Dozens of asylum seekers at Dungavel have been held there for months, with some spending over a year in detention.
In addition to calling for a time-limit, detainees at Dungavel say that they are also protesting the conditions – for example, they say that as many as eight people are forced into one room – and the fact that they are being held far from their friends and family.
Around 80 per cent of detainees at Dungavel were taken from the London area and the distance and expense involved means that they receive few visitors.
The detainees also claim that case workers are untruthful about their cases in bail summaries.
A public demonstration in solidarity with the detainees took place at Dungavel on Sunday within earshot of detainees. One of the hunger strikers, who gave his name only as Steven, said: “We know that people are fighting for us on the outside. Now we are fighting on the inside too.”
“Our message is simple: We want them to put a time-limit on how long people can be detained.
“If they don’t deport someone within 28 days then they should bail them out and they can report back.
“We are far away from our families and people are cramped into rooms. It’s eight to a room and 16 people need to share the same toilet.
“The way that people are being locked up is simply unjust – it’s inhumane.”
Steven said that one of the hunger strikers at Dungavel had to be taken to hospital for treatment and he added that most detainees were staying in their rooms because they were weak.
“People are starting to lose weight,” said Steven.
“The officers have said that they will move those taking part in the hunger strike. But they have nowhere to move us to as this is taking place across the country. We have only our bodies to fight with and we hope people on the outside can hear us.”
Earlier this month, a committee of MPs recommended that immigration detention should be capped at 28 days. Campaigners have called on the government to urgently implement the time-limit.
Jerome Phelps, Director of Detention Action, told CommonSpace that people in detention centres “feel like they have nothing to lose”.
“Many have been incarcerated without time-limit for months or years behind the razor wire, and at great cost to their mental health,” he said.
“The UK is unique in Europe in detaining migrants indefinitely. Earlier this month a parliamentary inquiry found that the detention system is ineffective and unjust, yet migrants are still being locked up, with no idea when they will be released.
“The Government must act now to implement the inquiry’s recommendations and introduce a 28-day time limit on detention.”
Asylum seekers and other migrant groups are held in immigration detention in attempt to enforce their removal from the UK or while their case is being assessed by the Home Office.
Among the detainees are “stateless” people and people from countries which it can be very difficult to enforce removal to.
Dungavel, near Strathaven in South
Lanarkshire, was opened in 2001 and is the only IRC in Scotland.
The Scottish Government has previously called for the facility to be closed and pledged to ban immigration detention in an independent Scotland.
A spokesperson for the Home Office said: “Detention is only ever used as a last resort, and for the shortest time possible, after all attempts to encourage individuals to leave voluntarily have failed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here