SCOTLAND is almost certainly heading for another referendum on independence, with Theresa May giving the strongest indication yet that Britain will opt for a hard Brexit.
Yesterday morning Nicola Sturgeon insisted she was not bluffing when it came to calling a second referendum. It followed an interview on Friday in which she said a soft Brexit, where Scotland remains in the single market, would take that vote on self-determination “off the table”.
This was seen by the opposition parties and some commentators as a softening of the SNP leader’s position, though, her colleagues claimed it was not at all different to what was laid out in the Scottish Government’s proposals published before of Christmas.
Tory MSP Murdo Fraser had tweeted: “SNP Brexit stance: Summer: We must stay in EU or it’s indyref2.
Autumn: We must stay in single market.
Winter: Must be ‘Soft’ Brexit.
Spring:?”
But Sturgeon told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show “they will be making a big mistake if they think that I’m in any way bluffing”, because leaving the European Union created a “fundamental question” for Scotland.
“If we’re going to be ignored, if our voice has been completely cast aside, our interests cast aside, then that can happen on anything,” she said.
“And we have to ask ourselves in Scotland, are we happy to have the direction of our country, the kind of country we want, to be determined by a right-wing Conservative government perhaps for the next 20 years, or do we want to take control of our own future?
“And that’s the case that in those circumstances I think it would be right for Scotland to have the opportunity to decide.”
When asked for a timescale, the First Minister indicated that it could even be in the next five years. However, she insisted she was trying first for “a compromise solution.”
The First Minister added: “The UK’s coming out of the European Union ... has enormous implications for Scotland as it does for other parts of the UK.
"It has enormous implications for our economy, for jobs, for living standards, for trade, investment, for the kind of society we are, and I want to play my part in making sure we get the right outcome from that.
“That’s why the Scottish Government has published proposals that we hope are taken seriously, but thus far almost two-thirds of the way to the triggering of Article 50 we know no more about the UK’s position than we did the day after the referendum, and that is increasingly unacceptable.”
But, the First Minister added, “The argument for independence is much bigger than the European Union.”
Later in the day, May, who has previously said she doesn’t want to provide a “running commentary” on EU negotiations and plans, seemed to suggest the UK would be taking a hard Brexit.
The Prime Minister told Sky News it would be impossible for the UK to keep “bits of membership of the EU.”
“We are leaving. We are coming out,” the Tory leader said. “We are not going to be a member of the EU any longer.
“So the question is, what is the right relationship for the UK to have with the European Union when we are outside?
“We will be able to have control of our borders, control of our laws.
“This is what people were voting for on June 23. But of course we still want the best possible deal for us, companies to be able to trade, UK companies to be able to trade in and operate within the European Union and also European companies to be able to trade with the UK and operate within the UK.”
The SNP’s Angus Robertson said the Prime Minster’s interview was “empty”.
He added: “Theresa May wants voters to look the other way while she dithers over Brexit but everyone can see that she has no plan and no ideas.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel