SCOTTISH fishermen are being used as “pawns” by Theresa May in her Brexit negotiations, MPs have heard.
The Prime Minister made reference to Spanish fishermen during her keynote speech on Brexit as she claimed EU leaders would not wish to make them and others from the continent poorer by having barriers to trading with the UK.
Speaking during an SNP-led debate on the effect on the rural economy of leaving the EU, Eilidh Whiteford (Banff and Buchan) said: “That suggests fishing is already in play in these negotiations.”
Addressing Environment Secretary Andrea Leadsom, Whiteford added: “So can you clarify what the Prime Minister is offering Spanish fishermen and why are our fishermen being used as pawns in this process already?”
Leadsom replied: “I can assure you that we are not entering into any negotiations, as you will appreciate, until we’ve triggered Article 50.
“We are, however, consulting very widely with our colleagues in the devolved administrations and any negotiating positions will be discussed with them.So I don’t think you need to worry about that.”
The SNP tabled a motion noting concerns at the possible impact on the rural economy of the Government’s “aim” for the UK to leave the EU.
The party asked ministers to make a “clear statement” on plans for the rural economy in negotiations, stating this should emerge before the formal process of EU withdrawal begins – expected no later than March 31. The Government tabled an amendment to the motion which, among other things, claimed Brexit will offer an opportunity to improve the management of fisheries in UK waters and “champion sustainable fishing”.
It also said the UK Government wants a deal “that works for all parts of the UK”.
SNP environment and rural affairs spokesman Calum Kerr, leading the debate, said the benefits of EU membership to the Scottish rural economy – via funding, trade and freedom of movement – must be acknowledged.
He added: “The Government must offer a clear statement prior to triggering Article 50 on how it intends to mitigate the impact of leaving the EU when it comes to rural areas.”“They must do so now because the combined threat of the loss of direct funding, an end to tariff-free trading and the abolition of free movement of people could have devastating consequences for rural communities across Scotland, and indeed the rest of the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel