THERESA May laboriously struggled to get through her conference keynote speech yesterday after a series of embarrassing problems left the Tory faithful reeling.
Seasoned political reporters said they had never before seen an address from a Prime Minister so riven with mishaps.
The bizarre episodes began when an intruder gave her a P45 live on stage, continued with the PM developing a persistent cough prompting observers to wonder whether she would carry on and ended with parts of the backdrop collapsing.
READ MORE: Theresa May's speech was so appallingly bad she could be gone in days
The address should have been the highlight of the four-day event in Manchester and was meant to put May on the front foot after a disastrous General Election campaign in which she lost her Commons’ majority and saw Labour’s strength soar.
It also should have made delegates leave feeling refreshed and upbeat.
But instead a sense of unease gripped the hall and Cabinet members sat gloomy faced as May’s poise teetered as she battled to get her words out. “This is excruciating to watch,” tweeted the Scottish business journalist Ian Fraser.
READ MORE: Theresa May’s 'nightmare' speech prompts Tory panic and silence from Europe
Shortly before the bizarre problems began, the PM issued an apology to conference goers over the loss of Tory seats at the snap election. She thanked activists for their work leading up to the June 8 vote, before apologising, saying they did not get the victory they wanted “because our national campaign fell short”.
She added: “It was too scripted. Too presidential. And it allowed the Labour Party to paint us as the voice of continuity, when the public wanted to hear a message of change.I hold my hands up for that. I take responsibility. I led the campaign. And I am sorry.”
A few minutes later commotion erupted in the conference hall when a man, later identified as comedian Lee Nelson – real name Simon Brodkin – handing a P45 to May in front of a hall packed with activists.
Lesley Riddoch: May's speech was full of offensively dishonest assertions ... what planet is she on?
He was whisked away by security officers later tweeting that Boris Johnson — who has been at the centre of speculation over whether he will challenge May for the leadership — asked Brodkin to do it. Brodkin was later arrested for breach of the peace.
The stunt raised questions about the PM’s security after it emerged he had attended the conference with legitimate accreditation.
While much of the attention focused on the intruder, the PM’s persistent cough and letters falling off the slogan “Building a Country that Works for Everyone”, May used the 65-minute speech to announce new policies. These included legislation to impose a cap on energy bills, and an additional £2 billion to build “a new generation of council houses”.
But it is understood that the additional cash, for which local authorities and housing associations will be invited to bid, may fund as few as 25,000 new homes over the next five years.
Aides said the draft energy bill to be published next week may never become law, if regulator Ofgem is able to come up with its own proposals for an effective cap more quickly.
After her address she was hugged by husband Philip and Downing Street attempted a damage limitation exercise, insisting May was “happy” with how the speech had gone.
Sources blamed a “conference cold”, the combined effect of 28 broadcast interviews and 19 receptions for the croaky voice which repeatedly forced her to stop.
At one point, she was handed a cough sweet by Philip Hammond to help her carry on, joking that it was not often that the Chancellor gave anything away for free.
After she had finished, she tweeted a photo of a range of throat medications next to a copy of her speech, with the single-word comment “*coughs*”.
After a four-day conference dominated by speculation over Johnson’s leadership ambitions, May made no mention of her Foreign Secretary by name, instead praising the “team” around her in the Cabinet.
She singled out for praise Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson, often tipped as one of Johnson’s main potential rivals for the top post.
In a personal account of her motivations for entering politics, May told of her grandmother, who worked as a domestic servant and made sacrifices in the hope of winning a better future for her family.
She said that, even though she and Philip had not been able to have children, she too wanted future generations to be able to enjoy better lives than those of their parents, something she described as “the British dream”.
To a standing ovation she said: “It has always been a great sadness to me and Philip that we were never blessed with children.
“It seems some things in life are just never meant to be.
“But I believe in the dream that life should be better for the next generation as much as any mother, any father, any grandparent.
“The only difference is that I have the privileged position of being able to do more than most to bring that dream to life.
“So I will dedicate my premiership to fixing this problem, to restoring hope, to renewing the British dream for a new generation of people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel