INCREASING the proportion of women on public boards will help them “make better decisions”, the Equalities Secretary has said.
Angela Constance was speaking in a Stage 1 debate at Holyrood on a proposed law to boost the number of women in Scotland’s public boardrooms.
The Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Bill sets an objective that women should make up at least half of non-executive public board members by 2022.
If passed it will apply to colleges, universities and some public bodies including health boards, enterprise agencies, the Scottish Police Authority and Scottish Fire and Rescue Service. At its heart this bill is about equality for women, who represent 51.5 per cent of the population yet only 45 per cent of regulated ministerial public appointments
“It’s about this Parliament using the powers it that has to deliver a fairer and more equal Scotland. Women’s voices need to be heard and they need to be part of the decisions that are made in Scotland’s boardrooms,” said Constance.
“I believe that boards that reflect Scotland’s communities will make better decisions for Scotland’s communities.”
The minister said the bill would act as a “catalyst” to encourage more diversity in other areas such as race and help tackle underlying attitudes perpetuating violence against women.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here