SNP depute leadership hopeful Julie Hepburn has called for calm in the row over the timing of indyref2. The party activist asked members to trust “our First Minister to make the right judgement when the time comes” but added that the campaign to win needed to start right now.
The question of when there should be a second referendum on independence has dominated the contest to replace Angus Robertson.
Hepburn’s rival Chris McEleny, the Inverclyde councillor, has called for a vote in the next 18 months, while the other contender, Economy Secretary Keith Brown, says the poll and campaign cannot start until party members are properly prepared.
Hepburn said independence was “tantalisingly close” in 2014, but that any future campaign should not be a “re-run” of the previous one.
“Simply shouting the same arguments more loudly is not going to convince those who can be persuaded,” she said. “We need to build a renewed case for independence, and start laying those campaign foundations now.
“We don’t need a date in the diary to start this work. It’s vital that we launch a fresh campaign for independence right now if we are to have a chance of winning a second referendum.
“At the heart of these early stages of a renewed campaign must be engaging and listening to those who voted No in 2014. Some people will never be open to the idea of independence, but significant numbers of people who voted No last time are there to be persuaded.”
Hepburn added: “We undoubtedly have a mandate for an independence referendum, and I trust our First Minister to make the right judgement when the time comes and have every confidence our views as SNP members will greatly inform that decision.
“But if we continually focus on the when, then I believe we risk neglecting the more fundamental question of how – how to do we win an independence referendum?
Brown told The National that the SNP are not yet ready to fight and win a campaign on independence.
“We’ve got to be ready before the next referendum is called,” he said. “The party and its organisation have to be ready to campaign in that referendum and that’s the task we face now – getting ready.
He added: “Whenever we go into any campaign what will matter will be our readiness – if we’re not ready, we won’t win and I want to win.”
McEleny said he thought Scotland could not “afford to wait any longer to see if things can get better,” which is why he wanted a “referendum on our independence within the next 18 months”.
On Tuesday, Angus MacNeil became the first SNP MP to publicly back a vote on Scottish independence sooner rather than later.
Last week, his Westminster colleague Pete Wishart said the vote should only be held when there were “optimum conditions for success”.
MSPs gave the Scottish Government a mandate in March last year to formally request from the UK Government the powers to stage a vote, But after the SNP lost 21 seats at the General Election, the First Minister shelved plans, promising to update the country in the autumn of this year.
Ladbrokes yesterday offered odds of 2/1 for the next referendum being before the end 2020 or after 2024, and 6/4 of the vote coming between 2021 and 2023.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel