IN a pre-emptive boost for independence supporters, slapstick non-party movement, Scotland in Union, says it could replace Better Together as the lead designated campaigner for the no side in a new indyref.
In correspondence between the pro-union group, released under freedom of information by the Electoral Commission, Scotland In Union (SIU) said it was asked, “if we would see ourselves as potential lead designated campaign if there was another indyref”.
Alastair Cameron, the group’s boss, replied: “I said potentially, if the parties didn’t form another Better Together and at the moment there isn’t any other organisation like us, but I did say that if a larger and more organised campaign appeared, we might fold into it.”
The exchange was part of a SIU minute of meeting between the anti-independence group and the elections watchdog in June last year.
The minute also shows there was some difference of opinion over the purpose of the group.
Cameron writes that he confirmed with the commission that SIU “only need to report costs for activities which meet both the public and purpose tests”.
He added: “I explained that we do not view our long-running campaign to highlight the benefits of the UK as designed to influence election results”.
But, he notes, the Electoral Commission “said a person in the street would still see our activity as influencing the election, as ... our anti-indyref2 campaign influenced people away from the SNP.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel