IN the early hours after the General Election result I sat in the studio of the BBC at Pacific Quay and listened to the newly re-elected Labour MP for Rutherglen, Michael Shanks, talk about how there was no money left.
With one hand he said the Scottish Government should be spending more money on health, on transport and everything else but on the other hand there was no extra money to give to Scotland to actually do this.
In one sentence, not even one day after the election, this senior Scottish Labour MP highlighted that Scottish Labour MPs will have no influence at Westminster where it really matters.
I would wager that the overwhelming majority of the new flock of Scottish Labour MPs are probably opposed to the renewal of Trident, that is the policy of Scottish Labour after all.
But when it comes to any votes at Westminster they’ll be herded through the lobby to vote for £205 billion to be spent on weapons of mass destruction while at the same time telling us there’s not enough money to scrap the bedroom tax, the two-child benefit cap or to restore Scottish industry.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn 'in talks' with SNP over 'left-wing alliance'
There are no Labour values in spending billions of pounds on a strategically pointless, morally absurd and military useless weapons system at the expense of feeding children and putting roofs over their heads.
The costs of the UK’s nuclear ambitions, be they human or financial, are enormous for a small peace seeking country like Scotland. Vast sums of money are taken from Scots’ taxes to pay for the UK Government’s global power posturing which could be put to far better use improving the lives of our people.
The past 60 years of maintaining the UK’s status as a nuclear power has constituted a grotesque waste of public resources that could and should have been deployed to create a fairer, more equal society. The UK Government should abandon the obscenity of its unaffordable nuclear weapons of mass destruction programme.
But they won’t. Whether we have a Labour government or a Tory government, nuclear weapons will be hosted on the Clyde at the expense of investment in health, housing, transport and jobs.
Bairns Not Bombs was one of the galvanising messages of the independence movement in the run-up the 2014 referendum.
The Scottish Labour MP Michael Shanks (Image: PA)
Had we won in 2014 then the regulation of all nuclear activity would now rest with an independent Scottish state and its parliamentarians. It would be us who would decide what was safe and what was not; we would decide the timetable for the removal of WMDs from Scottish shores.
The dogs in the street wouldn’t have believed back then that an SNP government under Alex Salmond would allow the British state to keep Trident on the Clyde for years after independence, but now we have one of the SNP’s most senior defence figures calling for his party to scrap its existing Trident policy and instead allow nuclear weapons to stay in Scotland for several years after independence.
That’s not a policy informed by fact but rather one that’s been influenced by far too close a relationship with the British military state. It’s what happens when SNP MPs spend years at Westminster wearing British military fatigues instead of settling up for Scotland.
Just imagine what sort of country we would live in today if our oil wealth wasn’t squandered and we weren’t forced to waste obscene amounts of money on nuclear weapons?
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry not running for Holyrood unless SNP face down 'misogyny'
The rotting hulls of Dreadnought subs retired in the 1980s have been rusting at Rosyth longer than they were in service. It costs £30 million a year to maintain their “storage” and future dismantling costs of the redundant fleet is expected to exceed a further £3 billion.
IN today’s prices, the Trident programme cost about £21bn, plus additional running costs of circa £3bn per annum. The estimated cost of the replacement Dreadnought class submarines is an eye-watering £31bn, plus a further £10bn contingency, and in-service costs expected to continue at about 6% of MoD expenditure.
Over the next 30 years, the Trident replacement programme will cost more than £200bn.
That’s the equivalent of building 400 hospitals. It’s the A9 duelled 100 times. It would be cheaper to give every home in Scotland a 24 carat gold plated front door than it would be to renew Trident. And these figures will only go up. Even the National Audit Office has raised concerns over the affordability of the Ministry of Defence’s overall equipment plan. But these astronomical figures continue to be spent on our behalf because it’s what Rule Britannia wants.
At HMNB Clyde and RNAD Coulport there were 15 recorded radiation leaks and a further 43 at Faslane in 2023 alone – and these are the ones the MoD admits to.
Scottish Labour MPs won’t stand up in opposition to Trident and the independence movement will not look kindly on the SNP calls to compromise on Trident. Alba want to see nuclear weapons removed from Scotland from day one of independence.
It’s a position endorsed by the former chair of UK CND and confirmed as viable by people that have actually walked across the gangway onto submarines and watched as nuclear warheads are mated on to their delivery systems.
When it comes to ridding Scotland of nuclear weapons, Alba Party will never compromise. On the contrary, it should be an integral part of the case for why Scotland must become an independent nation as speedily as possible.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel