A WAR of words has erupted between Clermont and Champions Cup organisers over the handling of their aborted European clash with Saracens.
The heavyweight Pool Two showdown, a repeat of last season’s final, was originally scheduled for Sunday at 3.15pm but adverse weather conditions around Allianz Park resulted in its postponement.
European Professional Club Rugby announced late that evening that due to “health and safety concerns” the game would be played yesterday with a 5.30pm kick-off behind closed doors.
A further change was made the following morning when Saracens said that supporters are able to attend at Allianz Park following an assessment of the stadium facilities overnight.
Saracens lost the rescheduled match14-46.
Clermont, however, insist they were not consulted throughout a process they describe as “completely absurd” and are angry at multiple time changes to the kick-off time for the rearranged fixture.
“The club is very annoyed by this completely absurd situation with multiple twists and turns,” a statement released by the beaten 2017 finalists read.
“In the end, for a few inches of snow, the organisation of this meeting ran into ridicule and absurdity.
“Whatever happens on the pitch at Allianz Park this afternoon, this will remain an episode more of amateurism which can sometimes be seen in our sport.
“The club have never been invited to the negotiating table and must now adapt to the incompetence of the public authorities and Saracens to organise this major sporting event.”
EPCR chief executive Vincent Gaillard insists that while there were issues communicating the decision, Clermont’s response is unreasonable
“Clermont’s reaction is totally unjustified and unfair. They grossly underestimated the severity of the weather events that caused major disruption,” Gaillard said. “The final decision was the correct one.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here