CRAIG Levein has launched a stinging attack on Brendan Rodgers, suggesting that the Celtic manager’s refusal to blood teenage talent is more damaging to Scottish football than the length of the grass at Tynecastle could ever be.
Rodgers was outspoken regarding the state of the surface in Gorgie following his side’s 3-1 triumph on Sunday, describing it as “embarrassing”.
Levein has no qualms about admitting that he made a conscious decision not to have the turf cut short ahead of the visit of the champions, emphasising that no rules were broken.
However, he was particularly irked by Rodgers suggesting the progress of young players could be hampered by pitches like Hearts’.
Rodgers said: “Of course it’s gamesmanship but that’s 30 years ago, Christ. If that’s what you want to do, then fine – but it’s not football. Scotland haven’t qualified [for a major finals] for 20-odd years and we’re trying to develop players and a product here to move the game on.”
Levein has handed senior debuts to the likes of Anthony McDonald, Harry Cochrane this season – both 16 years of age at the time of their first appearances – and this week completed the signing of Glenavon midfielder Bobby Burns.
He tacitly compared that to Celtic’s loan captures of Odsonne Edouard, Charly Musonda and Patrick Roberts.
The former Scotland manager said: “I never knew it was as simple as that. So if we cut all the grass short, then we’ll go to the finals? Brilliant. Why did nobody think of that? That’s just unbelievable.
“The development of players for me is about giving them the opportunity to play – much, much more than the length of the grass. That is a serious comment.
“Bobby Burns, for example, is 18 years of age. Some clubs in this country have got fantastic players at 18, 19, 20 and never play. They go and get loan players from elsewhere, who are the same age – and don’t play their own kids.
“That’s what hampers Scotland’s development.
“I make no excuses for trying to win the game. It’s just a nonsense. They actually won the game as well. God forbid … what would have happened if they had lost?”
Levein’s incredulity at Rodgers’ comments was only increased by the fact he said the Northern Irishman did not mention his disappointment with the surface when they met for the traditional managers’ chat after the game.
And he insists that if Rodgers truly wants a level playing field at Tynecastle, then he should arrive in Gorgie with a squad assembled on Hearts’ budget.
Levein continued: “I spoke to Brendan for 20 minutes after the game and he never mentioned it. There were no complaints about the grass.
“There was nothing in there that broke any rules. If you want to talk about evening up the playing field then maybe if he brought a team along that earned the same money as our players then that would be fair.
“The pitch was alright. There was plenty of grass on it. I wish I could be in a position where that’s the only thing I had to worry about. It was miles better than when they were last here in the 4-0 game. I’m gutted about ripping it up now!”
Asked whether the grass had been cut following a sunny Bank Holiday Monday, Levein smiled: “Yes, of course.”
With Hearts limping to an uninspired sixth-placed finish, Levein readily admits he is ready to consign much of this season “to the dustbin”.
Form on their own soil, however, has been one cause for optimism, with Sunday’s reverse against Celtic their first home defeat since Tynecastle’s redevelopment.
And Levein is determined to bring the curtain down on the campaign in Gorgie with a flourish.
He added: “It’s good that the final home game is Hibs. The game has special meaning for everyone at the club, firstly the supporters – but certainly for the players as well. It’s a big game to finish with and we want to win. I completely understand Hearts supporters’ desires to win this match. It’s been a tough season for everyone and it would be good to finish on a high.
“This season has been really, really difficult. I’ve got some things to take from this season, but the rest is consigned to the dustbin and I look forward to next season.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel