THE decision has been made. There is no going back now.
Whether it is right or wrong remains contentious, but Victoria Pendleton will be riding Pacha Du Polder in the Foxhunter Chase at the Cheltenham Festival on Friday week.
The naysayers – of which there have been many – have argued she is not ready. That she is too raw, too loose, in the saddle.
Even those closest to her admitted she had made a "novice mistake" in a point-to-point race on Saturday after she lost an iron and was unseated from Supreme Danehill.
Her first start over regulation fences in February was similarly inauspicious when she came off Pacha Du Polder at Fakenham.
John Francome, the retired seven-time champion jumps jockey, has led the case against the defence, claiming Pendleton is "an accident waiting to happen" on a racecourse.
Grand National-winning trainer Gordon Elliott shares those concerns, but is more wary that the Pendleton frenzy – not a term that can possibly be used lightly – will be to the detriment of the Cheltenham Gold Cup, run just 40 minutes before the Foxhunter.
Regardless, the main issue is surely whether or not she will be up to the task.
Judged by her bold, front-running victory on Pacha Du Polder at Wincanton last week, a triumph which deserves added credence because it was terribly gusty, trainer Paul Nicholls certainly seems to think so.
Pleasingly, she did look pretty astute in the saddle that day, albeit riding a fine-jumping horse who was rated head and shoulders above any of his rivals.
But the Foxhunter, a tub-thumping affair featuring 23 other runners, will be an entirely different proposition.
It is, for instance, exceedingly difficult, not to mention idealistic, to imagine Pendleton being allowed a soft lead at Cheltenham.
And, whereas Wincanton almost felt as if everyone was simply willing her to win, she will have few friends on the racecourse at the Festival.
There is, after all, nothing very amateur about many of the leading jockeys either side of the Irish Sea.
Most of them know every single trick in the book, and many of them will stop at nothing at claiming victory on the grandest stage in jumps racing. Pendleton herself has as much but she is made of stern stuff.
"This has been no walk in the park, it has been physically demanding," she said. "I've had to dig deep, but I never wanted to give up. "This is hugely exciting. There'll be a phenomenal crowd at Cheltenham and I am so excited. Getting round would be incredible. If I get round on the horse and complete the course I'll feel like that's a gold medal."
She openly admits that she is inexperienced. That said – and this is a point that has perhaps been missed by many – there will be jockeys in the field deeply lacking nous and experience, so Pendleton will not be alone in that respect.
Some will suggest otherwise, but her road to Cheltenham that began last March has been fun to follow.
Her progress, according to Nicholls, has been astounding, and that has to be celebrated.
There have been considerable bumps in the road, too, and this is just as important. If she wasn't before, Pendleton is now sharply aware of just how fiendishly difficult a job it is.
PR and marketing companies across the land are paid fortunes to instil positivity into those who question the relevance of a sport that has always been greeted with a hint of scepticism from outsiders.
Happily, Pendleton, a refreshingly upbeat woman who speaks eloquently and with genuine affection for the game, has provided racing with colour and context during those bleak winter months.
Whatever happens next week, it has already been quite some story.
But the only unifying hope in what has been a divisive narrative is that Pacha Du Polder keeps his jockey safe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here