MALAYSIAN officials trying to determine whether poison killed Kim Jong Nam, the half brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, in a busy airport are baffled by post-mortem tests which have so far been inconclusive.
More than a week has passed since Kim Jong Nam was approached by two women at a budget airline terminal in Kuala Lumpur, where he was then apparently sprayed in the face with an unknown substance.
He did not suffer a heart attack and had no puncture wounds, such as those a needle would have left, according to Noor Hisham Abdullah, director general of health, who did not dismiss poison as a potential cause.
He added that medical specimens have been sent to experts for analysis.
The case has perplexed leading forensic toxicologists who study murder by poison. They say the airport attack is one of the most bizarre cases on record, and question how the two women could walk away unscathed after deploying an agent potent enough to kill Kim before he could make it to hospital. Some type of nerve gas or ricin, a deadly substance found in castor beans, have been suggested as possible toxins used.
A strong opioid compound could also have been liquidised, although would probably have incapacitated the victim immediately. Surveillance footage shows Kim walking calmly downstairs to the airport’s clinic.
The older half brother of North Korea’s reclusive ruler Kim Jong Un is believed to have had at least three children with two women, but no family members have come forward to claim the body.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here