THE Syrian government committed “slow-motion slaughter” of an unknown number of Syrians trapped in besieged and hard-to-reach areas by wilfully denying them food and health care, according to a new report from a civil rights group.
Physicians for Human Rights said in the report that the government consistently exploited a new UN aid delivery system, depriving millions of Syrians who were unable to leave their towns and cities of desperately needed food and medicine. The group called that a war crime.
The New York-based advocacy group said a new two-step approval process for aid convoys that Syrian and UN officials agreed to in April 2016 “fell abysmally short” of its aim of ensuring access to all Syrians in need because the government in Damascus retained “unilateral authority” over who received assistance.
Besides the unknown numbers of people who have starved to death, Physicians for Human Rights said many others suffered avoidable deaths because military forces stripped medical supplies from aid convoys that did manage to enter besieged and hard-to-reach areas.
“Still others bleed to death from war-related injuries, or die in childbirth, or from other preventable causes because their besiegers refuse to allow the sick and injured to be evacuated to medical care,” the report said.
It called on the UN to make deliveries to the most difficult areas without prior government approval, and to document and quickly report attempts to restrict or block convoys. It also called on the Syrian government not to block, restrict or delay aid convoys.
The group cited data from the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) saying that by early December last year some 4.9 million Syrians lived in besieged and hard-to-reach areas, “including about 975,000 under active siege, most of them – about 850,000 – by Syrian government forces”.
It said only 24 per cent of people living in besieged and hard-to-reach areas received aid between May and December last year, after the two-step process took effect.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here