THE UN refugee agency has taken the rare step of urging EU members to suspend returns of asylum seekers to a partner country amid concern about practices in Hungary.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) criticised the country’s new policy of systematically placing migrants in containers and expelling those who lack proper papers. Since a new law took effect on March 28, Hungary has detained 110 people, including children, in “shipping containers surrounded by high razor fences at the border” while their cases are reviewed.
Filippo Grandi, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, said the situation for asylum seekers in Hungary was already a concern before the measures, and “has only gotten worse since the new law introducing mandatory detention for asylum seekers came into effect”.
The move is bound to put a new spotlight on the government of Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban, which has faced criticism from UN agencies and advocacy groups over its tough policies on migrants – even if its populist message has resonated in the country and elsewhere in the West.
A complex EU rule known as the Dublin Regulation holds that any asylum seekers should have their cases processed in the first country of the bloc that they enter, and should be returned there if necessary.
Grandi urged EU countries to suspend transfer of asylum seekers to Hungary “until the Hungarian authorities bring their practices and policies in line with European and international law”.
UNHCR spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly said the call for such suspensions within the EU was rare, and such an appeal was last made in 2012, also with regards to Hungary. Hungary’s “emergency measures” under the revised law also violate the country’s obligations under international law, by leading to expulsions of anyone who enters irregularly, the UN agency said.
The new rules call for all asylum seekers over the age of 14 to be placed in one of two container camps on Hungary’s border with Serbia until their asylum claims are decided. The Budapest government says they are free to leave the camps and return to Serbia at any time.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here