A WISCONSIN man convicted in the killing of a woman that was the focus of the hit Netflix series Making a Murderer has had his request for a new trial denied.
Steven Avery’s attorney said she planned to present new evidence to the court to try and revive his request after it was rejected by a state circuit judge.
Avery had argued that his conviction in the 2005 death of photographer Teresa Halbach was based on planted evidence and false testimony.
“We have additional test results and witness affidavits,” Avery’s attorney Kathleen Zellner said in a statement.
“The scientific testing is not completed, we remain optimistic that Mr Avery’s conviction will be vacated.”
Sheboygan County Circuit Judge Angela Sutkiewicz said in her ruling that based on the evidence presented so far, Avery failed to establish grounds to warrant a new trial.
Avery argued that new scientific tests cast doubt on evidence submitted at his trial, presented alternate theories about the killing and questioned motives of police.
Given the totality of evidence submitted at the trial, no reasonable probability exists that a different result would be reached at a new trial, the judge said.
Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel praised the decision, saying it “brings us one step closer to providing justice to Teresa Halbach’s family”.
He said the Department of Justice would continue to vigorously defend Avery’s conviction.
Avery, 55, was sentenced to life in prison after being convicted of first-degree intentional homicide in the 2005 death of Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer.
Avery’s nephew, Brendan Dassey, confessed to detectives he helped his uncle rape and kill Ms Halbach at the Avery family’s salvage yard.
A judge overturned Dassey’s conviction last year, ruling that investigators took advantage of the then-16-year-old Dassey’s cognitive disabilities and tricked him into confessing.
The state is fighting that ruling and a federal appeals court heard arguments in the case last week. Dassey remains in custody while the appeal is pending.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here