A BANGLADESHI minister has given a list of 8032 Rohingya refugees to his counterpart in Myanmar to begin repatriations of the Muslim minority under a November agreement between the two countries.
Bangladesh’s home minister Asaduzzaman Khan said the list contained the members of 1673 Rohingya families. He did not explain how the names had been chosen.
About 700,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled army-led violence in Buddhist-majority Myanmar since last August and are living in refugee camps in Bangladesh, which has struggled to cope.
The two countries agreed to begin the repatriations last month, but they were delayed by concerns among aid workers and Rohingya that they would be forced to return to unsafe conditions in Burma.
Khan said he presented the list to Lieutenant General Kyaw Swe, who is visiting Bangladesh’s capital, Dhaka, to discuss the repatriations and other border issues.
“The Myanmar side cordially accepted the list, and they sought our help to make it happen,” Khan said.
He said officials in Myanmar would choose 6500 people next Tuesday to be sent back in the first of three phases, but did not say when the repatriation would start or give any indication of the overall timeframe.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here