MICHAEL Gove, for it was he, met an actual voter in a Glasgow street, who actually said he was pleased with the Tory vote, and didn’t want a referendum any time soon. Well knock me down with an election leaflet.
I have little doubt that there were other Glaswegians out and about in the city yesterday; the city with an SNP-controlled council, whose constituency MSPs are all SNP, and which heavily voted Yes and Remain in 2014 and 2016. And even less doubt that the message they might have conveyed to this most annoying of faux Scots would have been a) less supportive and b) couched in unmistakeable Weegie tones.
Prior his Sabbath dauner down Sauchiehall Street, Gove had advised the Andrew Marr Show that referenda and court challenges were not subjects about which the voters were liable to be much exercised. Perhaps he missed the many pronouncements of Professor Sir John Curtice on the same day.
These days Sir John is to psephology what David Attenborough is to the natural world – an all purpose guru whose judgement is supposedly unimpeachable.
READ MORE: Michael Gove claims Scots congratulated him on the street after election
The professor opined that given the turnout and the tactical voting deployed last Thursday, matters constitutional were very much at the forefront of most minds as they clutched their free issue pencil.
None of which will have been of any consequence to Mr Michael Andrew Gove, a man to whom self doubt is the rarest of visitors. Flagging up the single opinion of a single voter is the oldest, weariest trick in the political book. (See also “Mrs McTumshie husnae goat her second jag yet and she’s 103 next Tuesday.”)
Mr Gove, in my view, is a more dangerous sort than his boss – the man whom he once stabbed in the front to prevent his running for the leadership. It had come to his notice, he advised the waiting press corps, that Mr Johnson did not have the required character and skills for the top job. Well even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Mr Johnson is the kind of liar who manages to convince himself that he is telling the truth, even if only for so long as his lips are moving.
By contrast, Mr Gove represents the sleekit tendency – a man with a grasp of the relevant facts who displays selective amnesia when using them in interviews – interviews, incidentally, where he has honed the twin skills of never answering the question he is asked and talking relentlessly over his interlocutor.
Mr Gove knows fine well that getting an overall majority within a system designed to produce coalition is the kind of mountain where the Tories could never expect to get much beyond base camp. He kens too that when this was achieved by the SNP in 2011, it was won with a smaller vote than they achieved on May 6th.
READ MORE: Gordon Brown's plan to stop Scottish independence rubbished by SNP
And he knows that in contrast only a minority of UK voters even turned up for the Brexit vote where Leave “won” by the narrowest of margins, for an “advisory referendum” which was re-packaged as the sacred will of the people. Aye right.
Turns out that the back of his sofa seems not to contain the £350m a week bounty Brexit would shower upon the NHS.
Furthermore, we will take no lectures on sowing division mid-pandemic from a man who helped orchestrate the leaving of the European Market without a pot to piss in at a minute to midnight, from a man whose boss couldn’t find the time to turn up to five crucial COBRA meetings and only sanctioned lockdown number one when it was clear there was carnage unfolding in care homes.
People may not stop Michael Gove in the street to beg him for a Section 30 order. But let him be in no doubt that across the spectrum of Scottish life there is nothing less than despair at the incompetence and corruption of his government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel