SO this is where we are now: Dominic Cummings is the voice of reason, stating what we already knew, but still making us feel angry and lost for words in the face of the human tragedy caused by the British government’s catastrophic handling of the coronavirus pandemic.
Boris Johnson’s government, as the majority of governments in Western countries, wasn’t ready, and when the pandemic finally hit us, they treated it with neglect, repeating the same mistakes over and over again despite expert advice begging them to have a different approach. This is not breaking news: scientists from all over the world have been saying precisely that for months.
But hearing it from the mouth of Dominic Cummings, who used to be Boris Johnson’s closest ally, and who played a critical role in making sure he is now in 10 Downing Street, is both painful and outraging.
Cummings says he now believes that the Prime Minister is unfit to lead the country out of this health crisis. But the Vote Leave mastermind bears personal responsibility for why this country is in the situation of having a populist in power at a time of serious danger and instability. To act now as if in total disbelief in front of his former boss’s record at this stage of the pandemic would infuriate any normal person.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings suggests Boris Johnson did make 'let the bodies pile high' remark
I guess the past few months have taught us a valuable lesson for the future: always be wary of politicians who treat scientific advice with scorn, the kind who think that being a showman and saying what they think people want to hear is so much more preferable to cold-headed leadership.
We should have learned by now that someone who doesn’t have the humility to say “I am not all-knowing, I need people who actually study this stuff to give me elements to make an informed decision”, as if they were some sort of demi-god, should be disqualified from ever being in a position of power.
To be frank, we should have learned this a long time ago. We have had this kind of behaviour with Brexit too, and more recently in France, we have government ministers such as Home Secretary Gerald Darmanin saying that when it comes to tackling crime, he’ll always prefer listening to the common sense of his hometown’s butcher than seeing the actual facts and figures published by the French equivalent of the ONS.
Obviously, the views and feelings of ordinary citizens are hugely important: after all, we are the ones having to live with the consequences of the decisions taken (or neglected) by the government.
However, saying that expertise and science are incompatible with public opinion is a fallacy. The fact is that Darmanin is using the widespread view that criminality is exploding (which is false by the way, figures show that it has been stagnating for 20 years) to push for a more conservative, repressive agenda, and never ever call out police violence, which disproportionately affects citizens from ethnic minorities.
READ MORE: Gerry Hassan: Boris Johnson is overseeing the destruction of accountability
In Boris Johnson’s defence (I never thought I would ever write those words), I think it is safe to say that Dominic Cummings’ damning indictment of the government today could apply to many other countries.
The unpreparedness, the abandonment of responsibility, the procrastination to introduce restrictions to limit the spread of the virus, led to the avoidable death of thousands of people all over the world. Of course, there were always going to be shortcomings in this situation we had never seen in our lifetime. But that shouldn’t be a cop-out to doing our job as citizens, and ask ourselves what we expect from the people we elect.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel