THE EU-UK stand-off over the Northern Ireland protocol caused sparks at the G7 last weekend.
France’s President Emmanuel Macron made his views very clear in comments to the media. Macron adopted the determined, restrained – but only just – tone of a serious top professional faced with a staff member throwing bizarre, repeat, self-centred teenage wobblies.
In essence, Macron was saying to Boris Johnson: “Enough is enough. This is your Brexit, your agreed protocol, so now we implement it properly.”
READ MORE: 'Spot on': Watch as Macron calmly picks apart Johnson's Brexit complaints
There is much frustration as well as a concise rehearsal of key facts in Macron’s forthright comments. The whole chaos of UK politics in the years since the 2016 Brexit vote – and not only the Johnson government’s current risky antics over the Northern Ireland protocol – lies at the heart of Macron’s telling it as it is.
No other European country, he emphasised, had ever asked European leaders to spend so much time on its sovereignty.
Brexit, in other words, has dragged on and on taking up a huge amount of time when there was much else and other big priorities to occupy EU leaders.
Brexit was the UK’s choice – not the EU’s; Brexit is the child of British sovereignty, as Macron put it.
"You cannot blame the EU for your own incoherence." A devastating speech from Emmanuel Macron slating Boris Johnson over his mendacity about the NI protocol. Subtitles by @AlexTaylorNews pic.twitter.com/qKXiOGf0fg
— Ian Fraser (@Ian_Fraser) June 13, 2021
The French leader was obviously also fed up with the dishonest, game-playing way that Johnson and his government and aides (including new Cabinet member David Frost) are now approaching post-Brexit EU-UK relations.
Macron clearly – and rightly – thinks it’s time Johnson grew up, behaved professionally, calmed down and got serious.
The EU and UK, said Macron, need to act calmly and with mutual respect to implement what was agreed just a few months ago: “Creating arguments each morning is not a good way to do that.”
READ MORE: Michael Russell: Boris Johnson will let others take on Brexit to protect his support
Macron outlined succinctly the essential facts about the Northern Ireland protocol.
Theresa May had agreed a different version of the protocol, keeping the UK temporarily (but doubtless indefinitely) in the EU’s customs union. As Macron said this was a way of reconciling sovereignty, the Good Friday Agreement and the EU single market.
Johnson rejected this. He instead chose the current protocol, embedded in the international treaty called the Withdrawal Agreement. He knew, as Macron underlined, that the protocol he signed meant checks on goods at the Britain to Northern Ireland border.
The utterly inward-looking, self-centredness of Tory Brexit politics has also created massive frustration in the EU over the last years. Yes, Macron was saying, we respect UK sovereignty, its territory, but not at the expense of our own 27 countries’ sovereignty that, through the EU, chose to create a single market and to have border controls at the edge of that market.
READ MORE: Mike Small: Brexit's real driving force is lower standards and less regulation
Across the EU, the UK’s political implosion over Brexit has led to major, and justified, damage to the UK’s reputation and to trust in the UK.
Where, they ask, did the professional, pragmatic, high influence UK go. And given, for whatever reasons, the UK has chosen the self-harming route of a hard Brexit, the EU wants the UK to own it, to be honest about the two deals that have been done – the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and the Withdrawal Agreement – and to stop blaming the EU for the implications of those two deals. It was the UK’s choice.
Is there anything helpful for Scotland in this calamitous state of EU-UK relations? On the whole, not.
If Scotland was holding an independence referendum today, it might mean that existing EU sympathy for Scotland’s wish to remain in the EU would be strengthened. But in the end, Brexit is damaging enough to Scotland without the dishonest, clownish (but not funny) antics of Boris Johnson making the framework of EU relations within which Scotland and the whole UK now operate ever worse – more fractious, more problematic, more uncertain.
A way ahead on the protocol is there to be sorted out in the context of the Withdrawal Agreement and without further inflaming tensions in Northern Ireland. But it looks like Johnson may choose to make things worse before finding a route ahead, as if he’s stuck in some self-chosen groundhog day Brexit/“Red Wall” campaign.
Macron’s comments should be played to Johnson each morning. The EU has had enough. Its patience is at an end. It will not participate in a childish, dishonest, unreliable, unprofessional, unruly politics with the UK.
Time to grow up and get real.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel