ANGUS Robertson highlights the disparity between the actual situation in Scotland and as it is seen by writers (such as Alex Massie of The Spectator) who have started to believe what they themselves are reporting in the papers, on TV and radio (How we know Scots don’t share Boris Johnson’s view of devolution, December 5).
Just because the opposition parties in Holyrood and the media are perpetually critical of the Scottish Government’s performance on education, health, justice and the economy does not mean that they are representative of the majority of the people of Scotland.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson: How we know Scots don’t share Boris Johnson’s view of devolution
The London-based opposition parties in Holyrood have contributed nothing to the fight against the Covid virus, in fact they have done little other than demand more and more detailed statistical information in order to attack the Scottish Government’s handling of the pandemic.
All three parties appear to have placed more importance on the historic Salmond inquiry than the task of keeping services such as education, health, justice and the economy functioning effectively during the pandemic.
The handling of the pandemic has been the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back, exposing the total ineptitude of the Westminster government which has proved unable to offer leadership or coherent policies; consequently the dual role UK/English government has been a source of confusion, frustration and delay to the three devolved governments/Union partners from the very start of the pandemic.
The people of Scotland have realised that even in the midst of this pandemic the UK Government is far more concerned with securing its own future and global influence than that of the health and prosperity of the people who put them into power.
John Jamieson
South Queensferry
AS the UK and EU struggle on to try and achieve a deal, one should remember that it was not long ago that Boris Johnson told us: “That oven-ready deal I talked about so much during the election campaign has already had its plastic covering pierced and been placed in the microwave.”
Despite these assurances, this has proven yet again to be another untruth in Mr Johnson’s ever-growing back catalogue. A no deal, which remains a strong option, will mean deeper economic pain and disruption, and will, at least according to the EU’s calculation, simply put off a scenario where he will have to sign up to an even worse deal.
READ MORE: Warning of Brexit food shortages as lorry drivers could 'give Britain a miss'
Despite such a fragile situation, the UK Government is this week intent on fanning the flames and pushing ahead with the Internal Market Bill, which breaks international law and seeks to allow ministers to override the Withdrawal Agreement signed with the EU.
Mr Johnson may have claimed to have an “oven-ready” deal, but he clearly forgot to switch the oven on.
Alex Orr
Edinburgh
I READ with interest Alexander Potts’s letter in the Sunday National. His reasoning for Scotland’s means to independence, his singular paragraphs of information were well explained as to the why and how for winning independence.
However, his last paragraph was the the pin that burst the bubble of hope. He posed the question asking what the opposition parties would do if Scotland demanded an independence referendum. The Westminster opposition parties have expressed the answer in the negative, and several times already. That’s what they do and will continue to do so.
READ MORE: Letters: While the Unionists are rattled, it's time to put more pressure on them
He also asked would happen if the SNP gets its expected majority election next May. Well who knows? Scotland might jump for joy and Saltires would gather outside the Holyrood parliament. Johnson and his gang would most likely ignore it while checking their hedge fund balances.
Surely Alexander Potts doesn’t expect the Tory government to concede defeat and grant Scotland its independence. Not on your nelly will that happen. Tories do not retreat.
Mike Russell has suggested in his Sunday National article that there are plans afoot, but not to let Westminster know about, which will eventually establish Scotland’s independence. We, the people, have made our feelings known several times in the majority. It is up to the SNP government now to do the rest. We have fuelled the machinery. So lets see how it runs during the coming year.
Alan Magnus-Bennett
Fife
THIS is an instant remedy for the “indyref 2 permission refusal” which Boris will undoubtedly make: if the English government can walk out of the EU negotiations without a deal, why can’t the Scottish Government just walk away from Boris and co?!? Simples. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Rosemarie Hogg
Cromarty
HERE we go again – we are all in this together – NOT.
If you are royal you can hop on your own train and cross every health board and national border and meet whoever you like – just to say thank you.
Meanwhile the rest of us cannot visit our children, grandchildren or family in hospital or care homes even if they are just a very few miles away because we are following the rules not to cross into another health board.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon's comments on royals' trip to Scotland anger Tory MP
Please do not try to tell me “we are all in this together’ – it becomes more and more nonsensical with every day that passes. I have not forgotten Charles and his trip north with wife and staff when he was incubating Covid and may even have had it. Or indeed Cummings and his testing of he eye sight etc.
Winifred McCartney
Paisley
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel