THE need for effective action against climate change, as addressed by Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp in Thursday’s paper, is the most significant issue we face. There can be no independence, or freedom, or democracy, if we kill the planet we are living on, which, scientists now agree we are doing.
If we do not address this then nothing else matters because the planet will not be able to sustain our offspring. That, in plain terms, is the situation. Now we can either carry on ignoring this – as we have been doing for years – and accept the consequences, or we can act responsibly as parents and protect the future environment for our children and grand-children. There is no more time to waste.
READ MORE: Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp: There'll be no economy left to protect if we don't act on climate crisis now
As an economist, I agree entirely with Jim Osborne (Letters, Aug 14). This major reinvestment in the economy in a very short timescale is possible, but only by a government committed to major public investment and having its own currency and central bank. Gordon is right, but Jim is right also: what Gordon wants can be achieved, but only with an independent Scotland with its own currency.
Dr Robbie Mochrie, in his Saturday article, explains the financial pressures on the SNP leadership from strong vested interests to force the SNP leadership to stick with the pound sterling, which in his opinion will mean that Yes will lose another referendum and independence will be put back again.
READ MORE: Spell out that Scotland needs to become a currency-issuing state
So the message is crystal clear: we must move quickly towards independence, we must ignore the vested interests and their media, and we must get the SNP leadership to address reality, to reject new oil developments and embrace a Scottish currency and a break with sterling, so that we can move forward and as an independent country take a leading role in the fight to bring about the changes which will save the planet.
Of course powerful voices with their powerful media voice will scream in disapproval, but we must face that down and move forward listening only to the best scientific advice.
Andy Anderson
Saltcoats
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel