THE knee-jerk reaction to the word “nuclear” in the Scottish Government seems to be an instantaneous, unthinking “NO”, judging by the reports on rejection of the possible nuclear fusion plant at the Hunterston site.
Have they no scientific advisors?
A FUSION plant is completely different from the current generation of nuclear FISSION plants, in being completely safe. There are no long-life radioactive waste products and the tiny amount of very low-level radiation waste produced can safely be stored on site for a few years until it naturally loses its radioactivity.
READ MORE: Nuclear Decommissioning Authority rejects proposed transparency reforms
There is absolutely no risk of meltdown, explosion or similar catastrophe because if the fusion reaction is interrupted, the plant simply switches off.
It will be many years before such a plant can be built, but to deny Scotland participation in the scientific research and high technology required is a dereliction of duty and leaves the SNP open to accusations of scientific illiteracy.
James Duncan
Edinburgh
MY late husband was involved in energy generation for 30 years and he always said more should have been done with pumped storage hydro, like Cruachan, and less emphasis on wind farms. Admittedly he was in favour of nuclear power, as he said that the lights are going to go out if we don’t keep nuclear. I do not agree with nuclear as the waste has to be buried for thousands of years, and if is buried in a place that could be subject to earthquakes that would be too dangerous.
READ MORE: Tories consider building new nuclear plant in Scotland – despite Scottish Government opposition
As many of us as possible should take part in our local SNP branch activities, as we all need to use our particular talents to solve the problem of energy, and indeed all the problems facing an independent Scotland. We must not leave it to a centralised Scottish government in Edinburgh. All centralised governments take too much power into their own hands, and Citizens’ Assemblies are the answer, in my opinion. In addition, there should be greater co-operation with all the environmental/conservation organisations and government.
Margaret Forbes
Kilmacolm
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel