THE selection process for future entrants into the “The Royal Firm” is there for a reason, and the reason has been exposed in recent days. Meghan has been pilloried for being non-white, divorced, pawing her baby bump, or not being from a long-standing “Ivy League” family or from the long-standing “privileged classes” of these isles. Subtext: not fit for the job.
The role that these incomers hanker after, because of the emotional engagement to their chosen partner, requires them to obey the requirements of the “establishment”, which is a tricky one. Women – and it is predominantly women – who want to or are encouraged to join this band of elite misfits are required to turn a blind eye to their partners’ philandering, keep a “stiff upper lip”, dress appropriately, keep in good physical shape with noble countenance and perform the opening of the latest voluntary organisation without making a pig’s ear of it.
READ MORE: Actor Brian Cox says Harry and Meghan’s experiences ‘clearly traumatic’
Oh, and I missed out the bearing of several chilblains required to populate the independent schools sector, who will act as the attractors for this or that private school, just like product placements or the work that “influencers” perform for us plebeians, aka the little people.
Not to conform to these expected norms results in verbal and media attack, guided and orchestrated by the “soft” power of “The Firm” within media circles.
So when Lady Susan Hussey the octogenarian former lady-in-waiting to the late Queen, pressed Ngozi Fulani to answer her question regarding her heritage, and refused to accept Hackney, it is an insight into the elitism that sits at the poisoned heart of the UK.
How can anyone with such fixed and ancient opinion remain in a job, let alone a public-facing role.
Journalist Petronella Wyatt, having known Lady Susan from the age of 18, declares in her opinion piece in the Mail Online that she is neither a bad person nor a racist. She may wish to tell that directly to Ngozi.
READ MORE: Watch Netflix's first trailer for Harry and Meghan's docuseries
Sarah Vine, the Daily Mail columnist, has also attacked Harry and Meghan in recent days in her Daily Mail column, indicating that brotherly love has been lost.
It shows that the behind-the-scenes briefings to the press against Meghan and Harry and their lack of stoicism, as defined by Zeno of Citium, whose definition continues to describe that the “wise live in harmony with divine reason”. The attacks are driven from the fear of the collapse of the House of Windsor. So The Firm are getting their retaliation in early ahead of Netflix.
It seems that the ruling classes still believe that their right to rule is divinely given, and no jumped-up divorcee from yankee land is going to tell them they are elite racists.
Alistair Ballantyne
Birkhill, Angus
LET us look at some things that may have impacted on the NHS over the decades. When the Labour Party under Clement Attlee and Aneurin Bevan breathed life into the NHS, free at the point of need, open 24/7, what were the drug and alcohol addiction figures? And how were they treated? What were the figures for mental health issues? And how were they treated? Was Post Traumatic Stress Disorder recognised?
What was people’s life expectancy? How were the elderly cared for? Was there bed-blocking? How were these issues dealt with?
How many needed hip, knee or heart surgery? What was the population of the country? There was no Aids, or Covid pandemic.
READ MORE: Data shows 13 cases of invasive Strep A in under-10s in Scotland
As innovation and technology improved, so did our demands, expectations and requirements. A question to be asked is, if the Labour Party, Attlee and Bevan had the foresight to see the modern demands made on the NHS, would they have implemented this model? Or done something different?
As Douglas Ross struts his hatred and contempt for the SNP, along with Anas Sarwar, talking about sacking Humza Yousaf, they never suggest who could be more successful as a replacement in the present crisis. Readers, please remember it is easier to oppose than govern.
We never hear Douglas Ross, with his Westminster Tory MP’s hat on, shouting for Health Secretary Steven Barclay to resign over the English NHS shambles. Not only does Douglas Ross have two faces, but he also has two hats.
Nor do we hear Anas Sarwar shouting or reporting back to head office in London about how poorly Eluned Morgan, Labour’s Welsh Health Secretary, is performing down in the valleys.
READ MORE: UK Government under pressure to release Michelle Mone PPE contract
Ross and Sarwar are only at home blaming Nicola Sturgeon for the faults over the decades that have really emanated from their Westminster base, but not only in the NHS.
The NHS throughout Britain is one mighty shambles. In Scotland we appear to have succeeded in having the best shambles, but that is nothing to be proud of.
The Covid pandemic has certainly played its part in the downfall of the NHS, which is really needing open heart surgery, which will cost money, time and in the end possibly expense for users.
What has to be remembered is that no-one becomes unwell or gets worn joints intentionally, but the long tentacles of the NHS now play a part in every family’s life.
At present we appear to be just throwing money at the NHS, where standing back and reflecting, assessing and reviewing may lead to a better service and model, hopefully still free of charge.
Robert McCaw
Renfrew
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel