I AM surprised that Alasdair Ferguson, writing in The National, an organ of independent thinking, has wholesale adopted the propaganda of North Coast 500 Ltd regarding its “visitor pledge” (NC500 plan for irresponsible tourism crackdown, Oct 30).
For a start, the whole company would appear to be based on a false premise – how can individuals market something that does not belong to them in the first place? The roads which comprise this “route” are public highways, indeed the only lifelines for communities. The company appears to have ingratiated itself with our elected representatives, but not, I hazard a guess, with most of the electorate.
NC500 Ltd somehow managed to devise a scheme whereby it creams money from tourists through various marketing ploys, but it does nothing in return by way of investment in infrastructure, expecting the local population to fund that through their taxes.
READ MORE: Man dies after falling near Scottish castle located on NC500 route
As someone who belongs to the Highlands I feel extremely let down by local and national politicians for allowing this farce to continue in its exploitation of an area of outstanding beauty and fragile communities. They need to look at sustainable development; tourism is not the only way. I would respectfully suggest they should look at New Zealand and Iceland with a view to implementing their methods of tourism management, and that they look more seriously at meaningful development of rural industries.
As for NC500 Ltd, I suggest they desist from fooling a gullible public in order to line their own pockets through the prostitution of a landscape which has suffered sufficiently from exploitation in the past. We had sustainable tourism in these parts – we now experience overtourism, largely in the ungainly and damaging form of motorhomes. For the sake of the land and its communities, it needs to stop. And journalists should carefully check their sources.
Susan Black
Rhiconich, Sutherland
HIGHLAND Council has rightfully agreed to implement Councillor Helen Crawford’s important motion to help communities deal with the plethora of Big Energy planning applications, including producing a regularly updated energy development cumulative impact map; something that is desperately needed to show councillors and residents the terrifying industrial tsunami that is engulfing us.
Other local authorities would be well advised to follow Highland Council’s lead on this.
Meanwhile it suits the Scottish Government to excitedly leap into bed with the UK Government with all the decorum of a ravenous Labrador in a dog food testing facility in a blatant joint attempt to efficiently speed up the destruction of our rural environment by the same global investment companies, against the wishes of the very people they are paid to protect.
READ MORE: Road to iconic beauty spot to close next week as people told to 'avoid area'
The recent consultation announced by the UK Government and excitedly embraced by Scottish ministers is a democratic outrage.
It is intent on removing local voices and centralising planning powers to the benefit of the profit-driven multinationals.
Campaigners have been aware for some time that forces within the SNP, both here and in Westminster, are ignoring the desperate situation in which their own constituents are finding themselves, with mental distress and devalued homes, and are speaking up and lobbying for the Big Energy companies that are merrily colonising our environment for profit. The most distasteful part of this new “consultation” is to do away with the automatic public inquiry being triggered by a local authority objection to a large industrial development.
READ MORE: Keira Knightley spotted in Highlands filming new Netflix movie
Local authorities should be listening to the people who live in the locality and representing their views – they don’t always do so, but that is their job. To take away the opportunity for developers and their plans to be scrutinised in a public forum by crucially independent experts is a disgrace. That is our right, and to deny us that means the only path open to us is court action against the Scottish Government for rubber-stamping the demise of our way of life.
It is a crass and deliberate act to crush local democracy by those we pay to serve us.
The Holyrood elections are not so far away, and every MSP should look in the mirror and ask themselves if throwing their rural citizens under Big Energy’s gravy train was worth it as constituents prepare to punish those who chose the side of the wealthy multinationals instead of theirs.
Lyndsey Ward
Spokeswoman for Communities B4 power Companies
Beauly
ELECTED on a wave of change, the Labour Party have just presented their first budget in 14 years. Oh how they cheered as the first female Chancellor announced a penny off the pint. However, my local have just put 25p on my pensioner’s-priced Guinness. Is there no correlation between politics and reality any more, and if not who’s in la la land?
Kenny Burnett
Aberdeen
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here