AREAS of Inverness underwater and parts of other Scottish towns affected by 2050? Laura Pollock’s report in The National is an alarming survey with major implications for householders and businesses (The Scottish towns and cities that could be underwater by 2050, Nov 9). Throughout Scotland many properties, vital services and much arable ground comes under threat. The Highland capital and surrounding land is only one of many places which could be vulnerable.
READ MORE: Legal challenge against Rosebank oil field begins in Edinburgh
Of course the data collated by Climate Central may contain errors. Maybe, but in my lifetime the Beauly Firth is an indicator of two significant factors in the rate of environmental change. Firstly, a rise in tidal levels. and secondly much of the birdlife has vanished. No sweeping flocks of migrating waders, fewer gulls, no oystercatchers nesting near the sea wall. The prime arable land surrounding the west end of the firth was drained and protected by flood banks built by the estates 200 years ago.
Who is responsible for protecting these areas today? Who will foot the bill, council taxpayers, Holyrood? No waiting until Trump’s Westminster is underwater? It’s another race against the dangers of climate change. Independence! Scotland must decide.
Iain R Thomson
Strathglass
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here