RURAL areas already pose a logistical and recruitment nightmare when it comes to delivering public services, and it’s about to get worse.
To meet a costly tax bill, Police Scotland has announced an occupancy charge for officers living in police accommodation. In a very short-sighted move, officers could be slapped with a bill of anything from £200 to £600, according to 1919 Magazine.
This newly imposed charge could push officers out of remote and rural areas, and the Scottish Police Federation believes this is a very real threat.
A survey conducted by the federation suggests that 38% of respondents living in accommodation would look to transfer, while a further 50% say they would also consider moving, having not budgeted for the charge.
READ MORE: Prescient play finds humour in dark side of Ulster history
The lack of forward planning and safeguarding for the future is shocking. In most professions which struggle to recruit in remote areas, their number-one problem is housing – available, suitable and affordable housing. Why would the Scottish Government make the mistake of pulling this incentive?
Remote and rural recruitment is hard so it’s only a certain type of person who can take up a post in these communities. This coupled with most young people wanting to live in more urban areas means there have to be incentives to work in remoteness.
Although Scotland remains one of the only countries within the UK to still own a considerable amount of accommodation for its police (approximately 120 Scottish officers have police accommodation), why should we view this as a tradition forgone?
READ MORE: UK Government yet to hold Cabinet meeting in flagship Edinburgh hub
We once used to readily provide housing for professions such as nursing and policing. In healthcare, this was a common occurrence, but now those properties have all been sold and we’re facing staffing issues.
The Highlands and Islands division already faces heightened pressures. Chief Superintendent Rob Shepherd spoke of the challenges that police officers in rural Scotland face.
Working in a small community means everyone knows exactly who you are and it’s more than likely that whatever incident you’re dealing with, you may well know the people involved. There is little chance to fully switch off from the job.
Shepherd also provides the example of an assault on the island of Benbecula which resulted in the only two officers in the area being recalled to arrest and wait overnight with the suspect for the next ferry. This then demanded two officers in Stornoway to make the two-hour journey to meet them. During the almost 20-hour ordeal, no-one was policing Lewis or Harris, and those officers worked a 16-hour shift on a day off. The rural police officer life is a hard one and not everyone is suited to meet the challenges.
Those challenges are in stark contrast to those in Glasgow and this is something Shepherd spends a lot of his time highlighting.
READ MORE: Political attacks over Covid undermine efforts to tackle next pandemic
Scotland’s police force being centralised isn’t the worst idea in the world – other countries of similar sizes have successfully centralised their police. However, the problem is that policymakers need to understand that the challenges are different. The needs of a city or even a suburb are not the same as in rural Scotland. A study conducted in Edinburgh about a new police initiative might as well have been conducted in a different country if compared to Orkney.
Just like their colleagues at the NHS, delivering policing in rural settings costs more than in other geographical settings, so when national budgets are set in the central belt, this makes the current situation much harder. Although Shepherd covers the Northern Division which makes up 12,000 square miles of land (the biggest beat in the UK), the division only has 3.4% of Scotland’s police officers.
Police Scotland has warned that without an increased budget, it will have to take the tough decision to cut jobs, with some predicting this could be around 800 jobs by April 2024. Although this will put a strain on policing all over Scotland, rural areas cannot ride out that reality. If they were to accept the “fair share” which they do when it comes to budgets, that could mean large areas without any policing.
The Northern Division already took a hit in last year’s round of budget cuts which saw nine redundancies. Councils then issued a warning that those living within remote and rural communities live with increased risk because of it.
The delivery of public services in these communities does pose unique challenges for policymakers, and they won’t be solved by central belt ignorance. Understanding the barriers to policing in these areas means understanding the housing needs.
Employers shouldn’t be naive and believe all they do is provide a salary; for a job like this, benefits and the tools to integrate both job and lifestyle are required. Although it may be a quick cash-raising decision, it could have a detrimental impact on communities in the future.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel