FRIDAY marked the 716th anniversary of the coronation of Robert the Bruce as King of Scots.
He was crowned at Scone Abbey on March 25, 1306, but by September he had been defeated in battle at Methven. His queen, daughter, sisters and many of his allies were captured by the English and he himself was on the run.
The Bruce’s autumn and winter as a fugitive has been much mythologised since, most famously with the story of the king being inspired to keep fighting by watching a spider repeatedly try to spin a web until it succeeded.
The 2019 film, Robert the Bruce, with Angus Macfadyen reprising the title role as an unofficial sequel to Braveheart, depicts this period of the king’s life.
It depicts a disheartened Robert abandoning his troops, until he falls in with a Scottish family who inspire him to continue fighting for his throne, all the while he is being hunted by the local sheriff who is loyal to the Bruce’s rivals, the Comyns, and to the English.
There are several minor inaccuracies, such as potatoes in 14th-century Scotland, or very un-Scottish names such as Yorgi, Vargas, and the unfortunately named Boak. But what about the film’s depiction of Robert the Bruce and his winter as a fugitive?
The movie begins with the fateful meeting between the Bruce and John Comyn (Jared Harris) at Greyfriars Kirk, Dumfries, in 1306. The text on the screen says that Scotland is in turmoil since Alexander III’s death, leaving the nobility to fight over an empty throne, with many siding with the English – while only Robert still believes in Scotland’s independence.
In fact, there was a Scottish king who had been deposed and forced into exile by Edward I: John Balliol, and many Scots – including the Comyns – still supported his right to the throne. The Bruce’s loyalties were also much more complex than the film suggests. He had twice sided with the English in the years before 1306.
At Greyfriars, Comyn is seen having a sword hidden in the church before their agreed unarmed meeting. After arriving, Robert presents an intercepted letter from the English ordering Comyn to arrest him, causing Comyn to attack, but the Bruce defeats and kills him. There is no evidence that the meeting was a trap set by Comyn, nor was James Douglas (Diarmaid Murtagh), one of Robert’s most important allies in his subsequent reign, at Greyfriars that day, as the film has it.
Robert likely tried to persuade Comyn to back his claim to the throne, but Comyn refused, either out of continued loyalty to Edward I or Balliol or in the hopes of pressing his own claim. The Bruce struck him and then his followers came in, killing Comyn and his supporters.
THE rest of the film takes place six years later, in the winter of 1312-13, and shows Robert on the run, having lost six battles in a row. Only James Douglas and a few other soldiers remain loyal to him.
In fact, the Bruce was in a strong position by that time. He had won the civil war against the Comyns and their supporters, and had held his first parliament in 1309. Edward I had died in 1307 and his successor, Edward II, was distracted by conflicts with the English nobility.
When Edward did finally invade Scotland in 1310-1, he failed to bring the Bruce to battle and then returned home. In response, the Scots raided northern England.
In 1312, Robert captured Dundee, followed by Perth, Dumfries, and Linlithgow the following year. Stirling, Edinburgh, and Roxburgh were the only major castles still in English hands.
The film’s depiction of a broken-down Robert would be more suited to 1306-7 than 1312-3. His forces had been defeated at the Battle of Methven in June 1306. His younger brother, Neil, was captured in Aberdeenshire and executed. Robert’s queen, Elizabeth, his daughter Marjorie, and his two sisters were also captured soon after and displayed in cages at Berwick Castle.
His supporters in the church, Bishop Lamberton of St Andrews and Bishop Wishart of Glasgow, were also imprisoned. The Bruce was left with few allies and no doubt did consider giving up his fight.
The movie does not say where the story is set, but it is probably meant to be near Kintyre, as the film ends with the Bruce and the family that rescued him meeting with Angus MacDonald (Daniel Portman), Lord of the Isles.
John Barbour’s poem, The Brus, written decades after Robert’s death, claims that he was given shelter by Angus at Dunaverty Castle in Kintyre. Little is known for certain about the king’s activities in the winter of 1306-7, but he does indeed seem to have spent time in Kintyre, on Rathlin, off the coast of Northern Island, and the Hebrides.
The text at the end of the film says that Robert’s victory at Bannockburn in 1314 drove the English out of Scotland. In fact, they continued to hold on to Berwick, which Edward I had captured in 1296, until 1318. It also makes the odd claim that the Bruce never owned a castle as king, instead making his home with the soldiers and families of those he fought beside. Robert did hold castles as king and one of his first actions in 1307 was to recover his own castle of Turnberry in Ayrshire.
Despite these inaccuracies, the core story of Robert the Bruce, of a broken king being taken in by a family who inspire him to keep fighting, is fairly plausible – if placed six years too late.
Scotland was indeed very divided at this time, with many Scots opposing Robert. The king’s murder of Comyn sparked a civil war that lasted until 1309, and there were still plots against him even as late as 1320, six years after his great victory at Bannockburn. This opposition to Robert continued after his death in 1329, and would see his son, David II, facing another war with the English and their Scottish supporters.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel