THIS year’s Bard In The Botanics (BiB) mini-festival has opened with two classical texts that are not by the Bard of Stratford; namely, the outstanding production of Henrik Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler currently playing in the beautiful Kibble Palace glasshouse, and this outdoor adaptation of Charlotte Brontë’s much-loved novel Jane Eyre.
Shakespeare fans take note, the programme turns its attention to the English bard next month with stagings of Measure For Measure and an adaptation humorously renamed The Merry Wives Of Wishaw.
Outdoor summer theatre in Glasgow is a bit like a game of Russian roulette (albeit that there is more than one full chamber marked “rainstorm”). During the performance of director-adapter Jennifer Dick’s new version of Jane Eyre last Tuesday rain didn’t stop play, but it did force the unfortunate audience to take refuge within raincoats and under umbrellas.
Indeed, even before the inclement weather had made its unwelcome presence felt, Dick’s production had begun with a humorous reference to the bravery-cum-foolhardiness of Scottish outdoor theatre.
The play – which resets Brontë’s story from northern England to South Lanarkshire and Perthshire – begins with the cast members arriving onstage shaking their umbrellas of, in this case, fictional Scottish rain.
The vagaries of the Caledonian climate are not the only difficulty with which the cast has to contend. The quality of the work at Bard In The Botanics is generally more than high enough to justify significantly increased levels of funding (not least from the nation’s principal arts funding organisation Creative Scotland, which does not support BiB at all).
This production – which is performed in front of the backdrop of a generic Scottish landscape painting – creaks a little in designer Heather Grace Currie’s simple, broadly 20th-century creations.
In part this is due to a number of actors playing multiple characters (for instance, there’s little narrative sense in the arch-moralist Mr Brocklehurst – portrayed by the ever-excellent Alan Steele – wearing turned-up jeans).
A number of director Dick’s staging ideas don’t set the heather alight either.
The decision to have the six-strong cast on or near the stage most of the time leads, distractingly, to actors standing around pointlessly or, worse, turning their backs to the audience as an indication that their character has, in fact, left the scene.
Then there is the attempt to add some atmosphere by way of vocal effects (particularly the disturbed laughter of Rochester’s famously confined wife Bertha Mason) conveyed live via microphones. Modish this may be, but here it is repetitive and ineffective.
The representation of the immolation of Thornfield Hall by way of a moment of interpretive dance is mercifully short.
All of which is a great pity because, at its dramatic bones, this is a very decent rendering of the novel. Dick’s adaptation is crisp and meaningful, while Stephanie McGregor’s Jane is compellingly spirited and sympathetic.
Johnny Panchaud is, simultaneously, broodingly fascinating and painfully conflicted as Rochester. The pair are backed by a strong supporting cast in a well-acted, nicely adapted, but unevenly directed production.
Until July 6: bardinthebotanics.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here