THE first thing for Western nations to do if they want to stop terrorism is to stop committing it. Rendition, torture, selective assassination by drone or hit squad and mass killing of civilians cause terror and create terrorists. We know that Daesh is the progeny of the Blair Government’s disastrous invasion of Iraq.
The architects of that war now admit the Government’s case was based on – at best – a false prospectus. Today, the Government continues to use spin to foster the fear it needs to gain support for military action.
David Cameron claims “all seven terror plots in the UK this year” have been “directed by Isil or inspired by the group’s propaganda”. Look closely, he means terror plots, alleged by the intelligence services to have taken place, details of which have not been made public.
We know that when details of terror plots do emerge, there is evidence that they are not all they are made out to be. Those of us who remember the “ricin plot” will know there was no ricin and no plot. There was a chemical factory in East London which did not exist and the same applied to the alleged “potential Glasgow bomber” of August this year. And look closer: “inspired by the group’s propaganda”. Or, in other words, with no actual connection to Daesh. The manipulative use of language is also evident in the claim that it would be a “publicity coup” for Daesh should MPs make the sensible decision to vote against Cameron’s adventurism.
The idea that the ideology of “Islamic extremism” is what drives Daesh and others is not supported by evidence from the front line. Lydia Wilson of the Centre for the Resolution of Intractable Conflict at Oxford University reports the experience of interviewing Daesh prisoners in Iraq.
She quotes one who put his reasons for fighting as follows: “The Americans came,” he said. “They took away Saddam, but they also took away our security. I didn’t like Saddam, we were starving then, but at least we didn’t have war. When you came here, the civil war started.”
David Miller is Professor of Sociology at the University of Bath and co-director of Spinwatch
UK edges closer to joining war on Syria as Cameron says strikes are in 'national interest'
Claims of no significant civilian casualties 'idiotic', expert warns
The National View: That Daesh must be fought isn’t in doubt, but we can’t make a bad situation worse
Letters to The National, November 27: Life under Brussels lockdown is scary and revealing
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here