THE Transocean Winner is classed by [Norwegian company] DNV GL as a mobile offshore drilling unit (MSP hits out at cuts after rig runs aground, The National, Aug 9). It should have a dedicated marine crew onboard. Where were they?
To attempt to tow such a vessel through the northern North Sea/Atlantic ocean with no crew onboard seems reckless. They could have performed several tasks which may have saved the situation:
1) Clear away and lower into the water one or more of the vessel’s eight anchors.
2) Put into service one or both of the vessel’s 2.4 megawatt propulsion motors.
3) Attempt, if the materials were at hand, to reconnect the tow. Items 1) and 2) may have slowed or arrested the rate of drift towards the coastline giving more time to attempt 3).
Seems a classic case of a drilling contractor trying to save tuppence and costing itself a small fortune. A few phone calls around the Western Isles would soon have put a capable crew in place.
What do the Norwegian/British marine authorities have to say about such an operation so close to their coastlines?
James D Malcolm, Foggieloan
BASED on data from the World Bank and the IMF, analysis by Global Finance Magazine has established that smaller countries continue to dominate the list of the world’s richest countries, while the top three are unchanged from 2015. Lessons to be learnt here for our own “small” country of Scotland perhaps.
The magazine ranked the world’s countries according to their gross domestic product based on purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita.
The PPP takes into account the relative cost of living and the inflation rates of the countries to compare living standards among the different nations.
Twelve of the 25 richest countries are in Europe, while the US and Canada also made the cut. The UK did not make the top 25, ranking at No 27 with a GDP per capita of £27,241.
Topping the table is the Gulf State of Qatar, with a population of over two million (£101,406 per capita) and in second place is Luxembourg (£65,339 per capita), with a population on a par with that of Edinburgh.
In third place is Singapore (£58,909 per capita), with a population around that of Scotland.
Norway, with a population less than Scotland, lies in sixth place (£46,962 per capita) and Ireland, despite its previous economic troubles, lies in 14th place (£33,882 per capita).
Smaller countries have an agility that is lacking in their larger neighbours, developing a culture of entrepreneurship and playing to their natural advantages.
As we look towards our constitutional future it is smaller countries, many of whom possess considerably less resources and people than our own, who lead the way. This is where our future lies.
Alex Orr, Edinburgh
GLASGOW Councillor Alistair Watson mentions the possibility of integrating existing railways to take more flexible tram lines regarding Glasgow Airport, and also the dis-used railway lines in the city (Letters, The National, August 2).
I recall a similar proposal in the 1990s perhaps by the former Strathclyde Regional Council.
The old Maryhill line alongside the Kelvin would be reopened so that trams could go from Drumchapel into the city centre, where they’d run on tram lines along Sauchiehall Street etc to the High Street.
There they would join the mainline eastwards, until taking new track into Easterhouse.
Besides providing faster travel across the north of Glasgow, it would also be easier for people in these areas to take jobs in the city centre.
Robert Walker, Kinross
AFTER reading Julie McDowall’s generous review of Brexit: The Battle for Britain on Monday I decided to give the programme a go. I ought not to have bothered. It had seemed a fair assumption after all. With the presence of a new female Scottish political editor in Laura Kuenssberg, it ought be different. In fact the programme was as packed with parochialism and little Englandism as any I have ever seen.
Scotland was only mentioned in a very brief passing with a several-second camera shot of Ruth Davidson. My overall visual memory of the programme is of London buses driving past Big Ben and all the usual suspects being trotted out for interview. As a portent of what we are in for from the BBC during indyref2 it was more than a little scary.
Alan Clayton, Strachur
THE incredibly low interest rate is succeeding in sustaining high house prices, especially in London and district. However, for those who have managed to squirrel away something in the way of savings, it is having a devastating effect. The pockets of those who have scraped together a modest £10K are being picked to the tune of around £10 a week, £10 few of those can afford.
It would seem there are gangsters in the Treasury and in Westminster. Those, to quote The Godfather: “With a briefcase [you] can steal more than a hundred men with guns.”
Joseph G Miller, Dunfermline
THE UK – except Scotland – is heading for a shale gas bonanza with lower energy prices, significant job prospects and a manufacturing revival.
A Scottish Government report has already stated that fracking can be carried out safely but the First Minister refuses to give it the go-ahead in Scotland.
Ineos wanted to exploit Scottish shale gas for its petrochemical plant at Grangemouth instead of importing from America but tired of waiting for a decision from the Scottish Government they obtained licences to extract shale gas in the North of England.
Ineos will soon be importing English shale gas, using English workers, for its plant in Scotland. The Scottish Government must stop dithering.
Clark Cross, Linlithgow
SINCERE thanks to everyone at The National. It’s wonderful to have a serious paper with real news. I’m starting to use the Gaelic page to increase my vocabulary and understanding of our language.
You make me feel “the dream” will become reality and maybe sooner than I’d ever dared think. Many, many thanks.
Catriona Grigg, Embo
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here