THE Scottish Government has been accused of rushing to publish new findings on the horrific corkscrew injuries that kill seals in order to let the shipping industry off the hook.
Internal documents show that officials moved rapidly to release research suggesting that cannibal seals were to blame for causing the lethal spiral lacerations, rather than ships’ propellers.
They planned to tip the shipping industry off about the research ahead of environmental groups, saying it required “careful handling”.
At least a hundred seals have been killed by corkscrew injuries in Scotland since 2009, most of them in the firths of Forth and Tay. Government scientists initially attributed the injuries to seals getting caught in ducted propellers widely used by offshore industries.
But in December researchers witnessed an adult male grey seal in the Firth of Forth attacking grey seal pups, leaving them with distinctive corkscrew injuries. Documents released by the Scottish Government under freedom of information law show that after two meetings in January, publication of the evidence was fast-tracked, leading to its release on February 4.
In a confidential memo to the Environment Minister, Richard Lochhead, on January 30, a senior official with Marine Scotland, Ian Walker, recommended immediate publication “in order to allow developers to adjust their proposals in light of its findings”.
Walker was anxious about the impact of the new research. “The early publication of this report and its consequences for developers require careful handling,” he said.
According to a meeting on January 29, another government official was going to bring the matter to the attention of the UK Chamber of Shipping at a meeting on February 2. Environmental groups, however, were not to be told until the report was published two days later.
The minutes make clear that scientists thought that the new research did not rule out the possibility that some injuries were still caused by propellers. There was no evidence to date that grey seals had predated on harbour seals, numbers of which have fallen dramatically in some areas.
The January 29 meeting concluded by outlining further research. Scientists had “been asked to draft revised research plans to link grey-seal predation to harbour seals and consider potential impacts on local harbour seal declines,” it said.
Whale and Dolphin Conservation, which has led concerns about corkscrew seal deaths, described the revelations as worrying. “The tone of the advice to ministers, and speed with which it was delivered, suggests that helping industry is the government’s prime concern, rather than protecting Scotland’s precious wildlife,” said the group’s Northeast Atlantic programme manager, Sarah Dolman.
“Officials seem more anxious to keep the shipping and renewables industry sweet than to enact precautions and ensure that all possible causes of seal deaths are minimised.”
It was still unclear what was killing harbour seals, she argued. “The Scottish Government is actively looking to blame grey seals without analysis and presentation of all the evidence and has already let industries completely off the hook.”
According to the Scottish Government, the findings of the research were released as quickly as possible to all parties on the same day. “The latest scientific research provides clear video evidence in support of grey-seal predation as a cause of spiral seal deaths,” said a spokesman.
“In contrast, the possibility of these deaths being caused by ship propellers remains theoretical at present. Scottish Government have an obligation to inform all stakeholders of the best science available but will continue to investigate both aspects of this issue.”
David Balston, director of policy at the UK Chamber of Shipping, said they were informed of the report’s conclusions on February 4 “at the same time as everyone else”. He added: “I do wish these groups would engage with us, as we have repeatedly requested, instead of making disingenuous and inaccurate allegations in the media.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here