A COLD blast from Moscow hit the Church of Scotland yesterday when the Russian Orthodox Church decided to sever all ties with the Kirk over the issue of same-sex unions.
The news came after a better development for the Kirk, when the Presbytery of Lewis decided not to split from the Church of Scotland after the General Assembly’s historic vote to permit those in same-sex civil partnerships to be eligible to serve as ministers and deacons.
The Russian Orthodox Patriarchate in Moscow announced yesterday that “formal contacts” with the Kirk and France’s United Protestant Church would cease.
The announcement noted that the French church voted to allow its pastors to bless same-sex marriages and the Church of Scotland approved ordaining clergy in same-sex civil unions.
The statement continued: “We regretfully acknowledge that today we have a new divide in the Christian world, not only regarding theological subjects, but regarding moral issues as well.”
The Russian Orthodox Church pointed out that it had previously suspended ties with the US Episcopal Church in 2003 after it consecrated an openly gay bishop, and with Sweden’s Lutheran Church after it sanctioned ceremonies for civil unions in 2005.
There was no surprise felt by the Church of Scotland leadership at the announcement. The Russian Orthodox Church has been vociferous in its support of the crackdown on gay rights by President Vladimir Putin and his government.
In reply to the news from Moscow, the Kirk issued the a statement saying: “The Church of Scotland’s position on same-sex unions has been determined by its supreme court, the General Assembly, made up of more than 700 church representatives from all over Scotland.
“We are saddened the Russian Orthodox church has taken this decision. We remain brothers and sisters in Christ.”
Meanwhile, on Lewis, about 300 people from congregations across the island attended a special service in St Columba’s Church in Stornoway.
A statement issued by the Presbytery strongly disagreed with the motion passed by the General Assembly in relation to ministers and deacons in same-sex civil partnerships. It added the Presbytery would “continue to assert its liberty to preach the Gospel within the Church.”
Presbytery Clerk John Cunningham said the special service was called because people within the Presbytery were hurt and confused following the decisions made by this year’s General Assembly in relation to human sexuality and the ministry.
He described the service as uplifting and inspirational, with worship, reflection and fellowship in English and Gaelic under the leadership of Presbytery. He said Rev Tommy MacNeil’s preaching was well received and there was strong participation in the singing.
Cunningham said he believed the service had achieved its aim of demonstrating solidarity across the Presbytery, with ministers and congregations contributing.
He add that he looked forward to the Presbytery continuing to participate in the life of the Church of Scotland.
The Presbytery statement added: “We believe that these Assembly decisions represent a denial of and departure from the clear teaching of God’s word: that such relationships are to be between one man and one woman, and that always within the context of marriage.”
Very Rev David Arnott, Acting Principal Clerk for the Church, said: “What is important in the statement is the expressed commitment to participate fully in the life of the Church of Scotland despite their obvious disappointment at the General Assembly decision. The Church of Scotland does not seek to make clones of its members, it acknowledges diversity of opinion within the peace and unity we all seek.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here