HEALTH Minister Shona Robison has apologised to women who were left with severe complications following a procedure to treat prolapse and bladder problems.
Hundreds of women were left in severe pain and some are now in wheelchairs because of the damage caused by operations to implant a surgical mesh.
They felt their symptoms were dismissed by the medical profession and Robison said they should not have had to lodge a petition to have their voices heard.
She told Holyrood’s Public
Petitions Committee that the Scottish Government accepted all of the recommendations of an interim report into the controversial procedure.
The independent review of transvaginal mesh implants chaired by Dr Lesley Wilkie has called for better training to be put in place to ensure medical staff are more aware of the severe complications women can suffer after surgery, as well as for better research and data. The report expressed “serious concerns that some women who had adverse events found they were not believed”, adding this increased their distress and meant they had to wait longer for help.
A Scottish Government suspension on the use of mesh implants remains in place but MSPs were told that about 76 procedures have since taken place for women who were “fully appraised of the risks”.
Elaine Holmes and Olive
McIlroy, from the Scottish Mesh Survivors Hear Our Voice group, were joined by dozens of campaigners in the committee room to hear Robison’s response.
Labour MSP Neil Findlay said: “One of the issues throughout this has been that the medical establishment has had a real willingness to believe those who said that this was a fantastic procedure and product, and a real unwillingness to believe those who said they had problems.
“Do you think someone, and I’m not necessarily saying it’s you, do you think someone should apologise to those women who were not believed?”
Robison said: “I am very happy to apologise to women for them having to basically have the campaign they’ve had to have to bring it to everybody’s attention.
“It should never have taken women having to campaign in this way to shine a light on an issue and as I said in my opening remarks I want to thank them for all that they’ve done.
“We have moved a long way from what’s a kind of paternalistic medical model where ‘doctor knows best’. We have moved a long way from that but there’s still a long way to go and that is about informed consent.”
Scotland’s chief medical officer Catherine Calderwood backed the apology, telling the committee: “These women have been injured by something that the medical profession did, albeit perhaps with the best intentions but not with the best information.
“I would reiterate the apology that the Cabinet Secretary has said to the women behind me here ... but also to the other women who aren’t here but who have been part of this campaign.”
Speaking after the committee, Holmes said the apology had been “most welcome”.
“I think that it will mean a lot to the women because as you know we haven’t always been listened to or believed. That was quite unexpected this morning and I would say the fact that it was reinforced by the chief medical officer was appreciated.”
She called for the recommendations in the interim report to be strengthened “so that there is no wriggle room”.
Campaigners also urged the medical establishment to follow suit with an apology, singling out the UK regulatory body for medical devices, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Holmes added: “They can’t just keep saying the benefits outweigh the risks, that’s not on. We’ve received apologies now, they’ve got to step up to the mark.”
A Scottish Government-led expert group, which includes members of the Mesh Survivors Group, will examine the interim report’s recommendations on improved safeguards and how they could be implemented.
A former ambulance technician wept when Robison apologised because she felt someone was finally listening. Debbie McGeachy, from Glasgow, loved exercise and used to take part in charity runs. Now the 46-year-old uses a wheelchair and says she is a “broken woman”. Despite losing her dream of being a paramedic, she has campaigned for justice with hundreds of other women.
She said: “There were a lot of tears because this is them finally admitting what they have done. We and the MSPs are concerned that every woman who has had this procedure should be made aware of the possibility of adverse reactions five or 10 years down the line.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here