THERE are concerns that a government anti-extremism initiative risks stigmatising Muslim students, research has found.
A new study suggests that while school and college staff are largely confident about their duties under the Prevent initiative, there are fears about the impact on certain groups of youngsters.
It also reveals there is “discomfort” about the requirement to promote fundamental British values, such as tolerance and democracy, particularly the labelling of these values as “British”.
The Prevent strategy, introduced two years ago, requires authorities such as schools, colleges, prisons and health professionals to refer any concerns or suspicions they have about individuals as part of attempts to stop people being radicalised and drawn into terrorism.
It covers all forms of extremism, such as far-right or Islamist.
The small-scale study by the universities of Coventry, Durham and Huddersfield was based on in-depth interviews with about 70 education professionals across 14 schools in West Yorkshire and London, and eight council-level Prevent workers, as well as a national poll of 225 school and college staff.
It found that, in general, there was no widespread opposition to Prevent, with staff feeling confident about their responsibilities.
However, there were concerns Prevent can make Muslim students feel “singled out”.
“We found widespread – and in some cases very acute –concerns about increased stigmatisation of Muslim students,” the study says.
It also says a small number of those questioned argued that Prevent “might, in fact, be counter-productive to the prevention of extremism – either because they might lead to Muslim students withdrawing from sharing concerns and questions with staff due to feelings that they are being singled out for more attention and scrutiny, or because they might more generally stoke feelings of being marginalised by the state and society”.
In terms of British values, the study says: “We found widespread discomfort and uncertainty around the focus on the specifically British nature and content of these values.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here