FORMER US president George W Bush has said “there’s pretty clear evidence that the Russians meddled” in the 2016 American presidential election.
While never mentioning Donald Trump by name, Bush appeared to be pushing back on the president’s decisions on immigration, as well as trying to have warmer relations with Russia.
“There’s pretty clear evidence that the Russians meddled,” Bush said at a talk in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates. “Whether they affected the outcome is another question,” he added.
Bush also said that “it’s problematic that a foreign nation is involved in our election system. Our democracy is only as good as people trust the results”.
US intelligence agencies have concluded Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help Trump win. Numerous investigations are under way to determine whether Mr Trump’s campaign aided the Kremlin in its efforts.
Trump has repeatedly denied any “collusion” with Russia.
Speaking of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mr Bush called him “zero-sum”.
“He’s got a chip on his shoulder,” Bush said of Putin.
“The reason he does is because the demise of the Soviet Union troubles him. Therefore, much of his moves [are] to regain Soviet hegemony.”
Bush also stressed the need to back Nato and other alliances the US has with the world. Putin “is pushing, constantly pushing, probing weaknesses”, the former president said. “That’s why Nato is very important.”
Bush also said that the United States needs to reform its immigration law.
In 2008 Bush became the first sitting US president to visit the UAE. He spoke on Thursday at a summit in Abu Dhabi put on by the Milken Institute, an economic think tank based in California.
He made his comments while in conversation with Michael Milken, known as the king of high-risk “junk” bonds in the 1980s, who pleaded guilty to securities law violations in 1990 and served 22 months in prison. Milken agreed in a settlement with the SEC to a lifetime ban from the industry and paid a $200 million fine.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel