THE SNP's Mhairi Black has revealed the scale of misogynistic abuse she faces online, repeating in Parliament insults aimed at her which include the C-word.
The Paisley and Renfrewshire South MP said she felt uncomfortable reading them out but warned some people felt "comfortable flinging these words around every day".
She added when such language is left unchallenged and is normalised it "creates an environment that allows women to be abused".
Black's speech came during a Westminster Hall debate in which calls were raised for misogyny to be treated as a hate crime.
Please be aware there is strong language throughout this video. My speech today in Misogyny as a Hate Crime debate. pic.twitter.com/PmyWmPhr4O
— Mhairi Black MP (@MhairiBlack) March 7, 2018
Labour's Mel Onn (Great Grimsby) urged the Government to formally extend the current five strands of centrally monitored hate crime to include misogyny and provide for appropriate reflective sentencing.
Speaking during the debate, Black explained how she is regularly called a "wee boy" and told she wears her dad's suits – adding her and her pals "have a laugh" about this level of insults.
But she said: "I struggle to see any joke in being systematically called a dyke, a rug muncher, a slut, a whore, a scruffy bint.
"I've been told you can't put lipstick on a pig, let the dirty bitch each shit and die.
"I could soften some of this by talking about the C-word but the reality is there is no softening when you're targeted with these words and you're left reading them on my screen every day, day in, day out – she needs a kick in the c***, guttural c***, ugly c***, wee animal c*** – there is no softening just how sexualised and misogynistic the abuse is."
Black added: "I've been assured multiple times that I don't have to worry because I am so ugly that no-one would want to rape me. All of these insults have been tailored to me because I am a woman."
The MP also referred to US President Donald Trump after noting how she regularly sees men on Facebook talking about "getting pussy", adding: "Should we really actually be expecting any better, given the man sitting in the Oval Office thinks it's OK to grab a woman by the pussy and face no consequences?"
She added there needs to be reflection on what happens in Parliament, with the "full extent of abuse and danger" women face on a daily basis only beginning to be realised.
Black said: "Only a few weeks ago I was physically pressed up against a Member [of Parliament] in the voting lobby who is accused of sexual misconduct because there's so little room.
"Now, I don't think that's normal and I think it's fair to say that's something maybe that we should be looking at – something we should be talking about – because I'm blessed in that I have the same right and influence as any other elected man in this place, but what about all the female staff in here who don't?"
Black later noted she has been "very unwell" recently and unable to travel to vote, saying she had received abuse after Scottish Labour MPs Ian Murray (Edinburgh South) and Paul Sweeney (Glasgow North East) suggested she should turn up for work more often.
She accused the pair of continuing to "knowingly misrepresent and cause abuse", adding: "Judging by the House of Commons code of conduct, it qualifies as bullying – as it would in any other workplace."
Opening the debate, Onn said the topic had provoked a backlash of "vile fury" that she was a man hater, had no sense of humour and should learn to take a compliment.
She said: "Today's society is awash with misogynistic acts such as groping, sexual comments, upskirting, revenge porn, sexual remarks, leering, stalking and as the nature of harassment changes so must the laws which govern it because there are currently too many incidents not meeting the criteria for assault, discrimination or public order offences."
Tory Philip Davies (Shipley) asked if misandry should also be a hate crime in exactly the same way, adding: "If she doesn't could she explain why she thinks there should be one rule for one and one rule for the other?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel