TWO Tory former Scottish secretaries have criticised the SNP for turning every issue into a "grievance" and "constitutional crisis" amid fears the party will block Brexit legislation.
Lord Lang of Monkton said the SNP "would make a grievance out of a ray of sunshine" and that every other issue was subservient to independence.
His successor as Scottish secretary, Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, also said the SNP "are determined to destroy and break up the United Kingdom".
Their comments came as peers scrutinised how devolved powers will be treated in the flagship European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
Lord Lang said of the Scottish government: "They're working to a different agenda. An agenda with only one item on it, and that item is independence.
"Everything in every area of government in Scotland is subservient to that. Hence the neglect that we see of education, the economy and all the other matters that are their responsibility.
"If they can find a way of turning everything that happens into a source of grievance, they will do so. Grievance is their default position.
"They would make a grievance out of a ray of sunshine, if they thought it would help their cause."
The objections from the Welsh government to Clause 11 of the Bill were not as strong as those in Scotland, said Lord Lang.
"We're blinding ourselves to reality if we don't take account of the fact that the Scottish administration has a completely different agenda from this one," he added.
Lord Forsyth said: "The difficulty we have here in Scotland is that we have the party in power who are determined to destroy and break up the United Kingdom.
"That is their agenda, and as my friend Lord Lang said, every single issue is turned into a constitutional crisis and is a source of dispute."
He went on to say he doubted the Scottish government "will want to do anything other than continue this dispute", as he urged UK ministers to "get on with it" as they had already gone as far as any reasonable person could expect them to go.
"If we have a situation where one devolved legislature is able to have a requirement for consent as opposed to being consulted, then we have one part of the United Kingdom able to use its veto to subvert the wider interests of the United Kingdom, and that was never, ever part of the devolution settlement," said Lord Forsyth.
Conservative Lord Mackay of Clashfern, a former lord chancellor, has tabled an amendment to the Bill.
It calls for a joint committee from the UK Government and devolved administrations to decide which devolved areas to include in UK-wide frameworks, on the basis they must relate to maintaining the UK single market.
While the amendment proved broadly popular, Lord Forsyth said such a measure would "change and alter our constitution".
He added: "As I look at the amendment, I think 'who will speak for England'?
"The Secretary of State's responsibilities are for the whole of the United Kingdom, not for England."
Lord Forsyth also said Tony Blair regretted introducing devolution in Scotland given the impact it had on Labour's footing in the country, a claim rejected by Labour's Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale.
Lord McConnell, a former Scottish first minister, urged the Government to be more ambitious about its engagement with the devolved administrations, and suggested rotating the role of chair at joint meetings between different governments.
He also said joint ministerial committees "had never worked", adding: "Tony Blair and I both tried to get rid of them, frankly. We didn't succeed, but I wish that we had."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel