TORY Brexiteers are furious over the Home Office’s decision to hire a French company to make Britain’s new blue passport.
The current burgundy passport, made in the UK by De La Rue, will be phased out after Brexit and is to be replaced by a seemingly more traditional blacky-blue coloured passport, made by French-Dutch firm Gemalto.
READ MORE: Russell makes Brexit Bill plea to Archbishop who is backing power grab
Former Cabinet minister Priti Patel dubbed it “a disgraceful decision” and “a national humiliation”.
The prominent Brexiteer told a daily newspaper: “This should be a moment that we should be celebrating. The return of our iconic blue passport will re-establish the British identity. But to be putting the job in the hands of the French is simply astonishing. It is a national humiliation.
“I would urge Amber Rudd and the Government to look again at the powers they have to see what they can do.”
READ MORE: The problem with the ‘power grab’ ... and why it might backfire
The Home Office said that under EU procurement rules, which they still have to abide by, the Government had no choice but to open the bidding process to European firms.
And that by giving the job to a company on the continent they’d be saving the taxpayer millions.
Which led to Leave-backing Tories and Ukippers venting to the media about meddling from Brussels.
READ MORE: Davidson under fire for her fishy post-Brexit story
Culture Secretary Matthew Hancock told the BBC’s Today programme: “As it happens, one of the advantages of leaving the European Union is that we’ll be able to have more control over our own procurement rules.”
But that may not be entirely accurate. It seems the decision was entirely Britain’s.
And it’s a decision which could see hundreds of jobs lost at a firm that first produced a British passport back in 1915. However, there’s very little chance of a change.
Even after Brexit, the rules forcing the Home Office to consider bids from non-British firms will likely still apply in some shape.
If the UK does secure a trade deal with Brussels, then it’s probable that it will have to sick to EU procurement and competition rules.
And even if the UK doesn’t secure a deal, and crashes out in a hard Brexit, then it would still have to put passports out for an international tender, under World Trade Organisation rules.
It seems that the only way to get round it is to do what the French do and have passports made in-house by a government agency, and therefore not subject to EU or WTO procurement rules.
A spokeswoman for the Home Office defended their decision: “The chosen company demonstrated that they will be best able to meet the needs of our passport service with a high-quality and secure product at the best value for money for our customers and the taxpayer.”
The Tories have made blue passports a totemic part of Brexit.
“The UK passport is an expression of our independence and sovereignty – symbolising our citizenship of a proud, great nation. That’s why we have announced that the iconic #bluepassport will return after we leave the European Union in 2019,” May tweeted last December.
There was some gloating from Remain supporters over the row. Writer David Schneider tweeted: “I still think the best idea is to let people choose their own colour: Maroon passport = you can continue to travel freely, work and live across the EU. Blue passport = you can’t do any of that but you have a blue passport.
“Everyone’s happy!”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel